| 
		
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,151 
	Threads: 601 
	Joined: 2015 Jan
	
 Thanks: 1081Given 1490 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
 
 Country:    
	
	
		Just some random thoughts to start the discussion: "normal" BD-R/RE are HTL ("High to low"), using inorganic material for the recording layer
BD-R/RE LTH ("Low to high") use organic dye, like CD-R and DVD-R
BD-R/RE HTL have a provisional life of several hundred years, when stored correctly
M-DISC life may be just a little bit longer than non-M-DISC ones
discs places in direct contact with plastic starts to lose data after few years
the only "standard" disc read by any BD player is the BDAV one, without menus
BDMV discs, with or without menus, could be not read by all BD players
even top software can't improve compatibiliy of authored BDMV discs
the only 100% compatible discs are the pressed ones!
 
Discuss!
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,974 
	Threads: 54 
	Joined: 2015 Apr
	
 Thanks: 272Given 400 thank(s) in 252 post(s)
 
 Country:    
	
	
		I only use HTL discs, end of discussion ahah! They only cost marginally more than LTH
 I would add that some older players don't read BR made of one long chapter (I know of a Samsung model that has this problem)
 
AKA thxita on OriginalTrilogyI preserve movies as they first appeared in Italy.
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,092 
	Threads: 56 
	Joined: 2016 Dec
	
 Thanks: 163Given 1034 thank(s) in 628 post(s)
 
 
	
	
		The original M-Discs were DVDs as they were the first DVDs to use an inorganic layer, I'm not sure what the point is of M-Disc Blu Rays as the technology is similar (except maybe an excuse to charge more). The biggest problem with BDs is ironically the scratch proof coating, it takes on the texture of whatever it touches. It flattens out again over time, but it will cause read/write errors if you try to use them when affected. This is especially a problem when you buy discs online which have been repackaged, usually in paper sleeves. So always keep your BDs in a case or on a spindle guys and gals!
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,151 
	Threads: 601 
	Joined: 2015 Jan
	
 Thanks: 1081Given 1490 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
 
 Country:    
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,151 
	Threads: 601 
	Joined: 2015 Jan
	
 Thanks: 1081Given 1490 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
 
 Country:    
	
	
		Time to experiment with BD-50 - and not only! 
I want to hear your opinion on which brands to choose - and the ones to avoid.
 
The general consensus seems to consider Verbatim the top notch, thanks to its Hard Coat protection. I would use them for archival purposes.
 
For everyday use, I would like something a bit more cheaper, because it seems that printed media would fail earlier anyway, so...   
Ideas? Here on amazon.it there are some less known (by me, at least) brands, like Mediarange, that *seems* reasonably priced.
 
And what's about other important brands? TDK has that "Super Hard Coating", but costs twice as much as Verbatim; Panasonic, Sony, JVC, That's cost all more than Verbatim...
	 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,974 
	Threads: 54 
	Joined: 2015 Apr
	
 Thanks: 272Given 400 thank(s) in 252 post(s)
 
 Country:    
	
	
		I would always go for the verbatim brand. Mediarange has some scary reviews (one talking about air bubbles within the disk!)
	 
AKA thxita on OriginalTrilogyI preserve movies as they first appeared in Italy.
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,151 
	Threads: 601 
	Joined: 2015 Jan
	
 Thanks: 1081Given 1490 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
 
 Country:    
	
	
		 (2017-05-20, 10:19 AM)Evit Wrote:  Mediarange has some scary reviews (one talking about air bubbles within the disk!)   |