deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
That's interlacing.

Need to deinterlace.
Posts: 2,231
Threads: 79
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 481
Given 828 thank(s) in 428 post(s)
Image have been deleted, please fix.
Posts: 1,221
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 242
Given 361 thank(s) in 243 post(s)
Country:
(2019-01-17, 10:17 AM)Valeyard Wrote: Image have been deleted, please fix.
I still can see them both...
"Never cut a deal with a dragon..."
- Old Shadowrun wisdom
Posts: 292
Threads: 32
Joined: 2017 Oct
Thanks: 71
Given 144 thank(s) in 83 post(s)
Country:
The images worked for me, but I've reuploaded them.
Interlacing? It must be pretty heavy for it to be that noticeable. Thanks, everyone! Will keep you all updated about this one, too.
Posts: 1,221
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 242
Given 361 thank(s) in 243 post(s)
Country:
(2019-01-17, 10:33 AM)Serums Wrote: The images worked for me, but I've reuploaded them.
Interlacing? It must be pretty heavy for it to be that noticeable. Thanks, everyone! Will keep you all updated about this one, too.
Yeah it's from interlacing.
It is the "combing" effect of interlaced material.
If it was captured from an analogue source (LD or VHS) you need to deinterlace the raw capture, before converting, to avoid converting the interlace effects into the video...
"Never cut a deal with a dragon..."
- Old Shadowrun wisdom
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
(2019-01-17, 10:33 AM)Serums Wrote: The images worked for me, but I've reuploaded them.
Interlacing? It must be pretty heavy for it to be that noticeable. Thanks, everyone! Will keep you all updated about this one, too.
There is no such thing as "heavy" interlacing. It's either interlaced or it is not.
Fast motion can make it look "heavier". Google/Research Interlacing and you will understand.