Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 1,291
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 301
Given 417 thank(s) in 273 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 2,809
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1876
Given 1010 thank(s) in 648 post(s)
2019-03-25, 09:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 2019-03-25, 09:28 PM by Stamper.)
I have them all I think, one only need the original 1997 release.
For the remix, I think except for some foreign languages, all the other releases after 2000 are the same.
What i'm aiming for is:
- Original Dolby Surround TC
- Original Dolby Surround SE
- AC3 TC
- AC3 SE
- Squeeze LD Dolby Surround
- Squeeze LD AC3
- Squeeze LD mono
- THX DVD 1997
- Japan DTS (already synced here)
- 2008 Blu-ray france DTS-HD MA
I don't think other releases are worth it apart of course foreign languages.
IMHO the Squeeze kills them all. The online rip I got, I sampled, and it sounds so much more dynamic.
Posts: 1,291
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 301
Given 417 thank(s) in 273 post(s)
Country:
I have the first US DVD release... And the first French DVD release...
Posts: 794
Threads: 36
Joined: 2018 Feb
Thanks: 672
Given 1118 thank(s) in 419 post(s)
Country:
2019-03-26, 03:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 2019-03-26, 04:01 AM by bronan.)
Posts: 2,809
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1876
Given 1010 thank(s) in 648 post(s)
You can see the way the light compares between the X-Treme master and the new one, it's exactly the same, which shouldn't be because they are supposed to be transfers made 15 years apart with totally different technology.
Yes those noses tips especially look like they haven't got any detail and are painted over (all the shots of Dyson look also the same and he as a large nose), also the clipped whites are exactly in the same places on both masters. This couldn't happen if you scan a neg in 4K.
I mean for T1, the new 4K master has a stability of colors, and detail in whites, that this one doesn't. To me it looks like they went back to the 2K scan from 2003 which was 16/9 according to the booklet, bumped the contrast, upscaled it to 4K, then did some software thing on it that is used on Avatar films to render detail to make stuff look real.
We have never seen, ever, any transfer that is so weird looking even Patton or Predator look just like DNRed video, not remapped.
Posts: 796
Threads: 58
Joined: 2018 Oct
Thanks: 777
Given 922 thank(s) in 371 post(s)
Country:
I think the reason why it may be like this was because of the 3D conversion that was made for this specific master at the time (which in fairness, wasn't bad to watch in theaters).
Posts: 2,809
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1876
Given 1010 thank(s) in 648 post(s)
This didn't stop Titanic from being a perfect remaster.
Posts: 258
Threads: 24
Joined: 2016 Feb
Thanks: 70
Given 116 thank(s) in 74 post(s)
Country:
|