Hello guest, if you like this forum, why don't you register? https://fanrestore.com/member.php?action=register (December 14, 2021) x



Shoutbox archive
avatar
I'd like to sync it to the BD if it's legit
avatar
KK, please let me know if you have it
avatar
Okay, so the DVD profiler listing is also wrong... I think I gonna check my Disc ASAP, maybe there just was a faulty batch, and some are really 1.0
avatar
first listing
avatar
avatar
The audio is stated to be 1.0 mono on the hems Dale / image DVD. Or was there another release?
avatar
Seeing some rainbowing :-)
avatar
BTW, that German DVD Is from a composite source
avatar
The 1997 Image/Hemsdale DVD
avatar
Yeah, I am also still curious which DVD the 2.1 Version is from... Big Grin
avatar
Stamper: Can you upload the 2.1 audio somewhere please?
avatar
Read this on Bluray forum.
avatar
No, there are interviews or quotes online from the editor, who says the film was shot in square open matte, intended for 1.85. The prints were matted at 1.66 though in europe, but nonetheless shown 1.85.
avatar
@anctufaalb: AFAIK all Terminator US LDs in 1.33:1 are P&S
avatar
@ilovewaterslides: the exists proof that there were at least TV airings droning more to top and bottom, compared to the 1.66:1 DVD.
avatar
Wow, that was bugging me
avatar
Now it just looks like normal interlaced footage
avatar
@Koopa: the discussion was started about that DVD.
avatar
MPEG2Source("Z:\Temp\Terminator.d2v").SeparateFields().DeleteFrame(307227).DeleteFrame(0).Weave()
avatar
Take a look at this :-)
avatar
Wow, so there was a field dropped, guys!
avatar
There is a 1.66:1 DVD in Germany, but it's pan and scan.
avatar
So you guys still didn't figure out that Terminator was shot hard matted 1.66:1? Woo
avatar
avatar
Which US LD is open matte?
avatar
damn
avatar
False alarm! Sad just made a comparison with the DVD, and the only open matte part is the initial introduction, while the rest of the movie is simply pan&scan...
avatar
Wow! Can you send a pic?
avatar
The Italian LD has the same image size as this http://fastpic.ru/view/70/2015/1004/7f5f...c.jpg.html - apart few pixels less on the left...
avatar
I'm working on fixing a 2 second glitch in it.
avatar
Oh, BTW, I doubt anyone cares, but I have discrete 5.1 audio for Twins (1988). This has never been released on any home video format.
avatar
Has anyone compared the mono audio from the LD of "The Sting" to the 5.1 track that has shown up on the DVD and BD releases?
avatar
This is epic
avatar
Sorry, it's certainly not in my collection... many US versions and one UK one... plus a Japanese from a friend... Wink
avatar
The German pre-dvd LD, FSK18, slightly censored: http://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/36203/5020...inator-The
avatar
I stay away from the shoutbox, and few hours later so many messages?!? Big Grin repost the LD catalog number, *maybe* I have it - should check...
avatar
Which image DVD has 2.1 sound? I only can see 1.0 on the backside...
avatar
I have the image dvd, it's great. The 2.1 sounds awesome
avatar
I think my LD stands between an US and the Japanese LD... But I am not sure...
avatar
Uhm...
avatar
Someone would have to track down that LD.
avatar
According to LDDB.com the german VCL LD of the Terminator is from 1995... The DVD from 1998... So it is possible that they botched the transfer from LD to DVD...
avatar
Or something
avatar
One person posts well lit and scanned images - though low resolution, only 500px wide
avatar
Look at the ones that start with T1
avatar
the T1 ones are film cells I've saved images of from eBay (mostly U.K.)
avatar
avatar
Maybe one of us should buy a copy
avatar
There are copies on eBay, they're cheaper than I'd have assumed
avatar
Yeah, it's in my DVD collection...
avatar
Ah.. Hemdale and Image...
avatar
It think I have it.
avatar
The image DVD?
avatar
nope
avatar
Does anybody have the 1997 DVD? I don't
avatar
So the only releases we know to have had the huge Ellison credit were the 90s Hemdale transfers and the MGM ones.
avatar
Though I'd be surprised if they didn't reshoot the credits earlier, they look of the time. I compared the two once, no errors or anything. Just differences in the scroll speed and maybe some spacing. A couple credits were moved out of the scroll.
avatar
On DVD it was a novelty, on image there was, AFAIK one issue without it at all, and a release with the first version after or in the end credits, not at the beginning.
avatar
It wasn't until the early 90s when Harlan got upset again around T2 that we finally saw the reshot text at the start of the credits
avatar
The HBO transfer added a video text during the end credits IIRC
avatar
Maybe the LD was before the DVD, and the porting technic was a bit sh*t...
avatar
or was it the first Hemdale LD?
avatar
I will say that the lack of an Ellison credit is not as much of a novelty as I thought. I think the Image LD was entirely missing it
avatar
The German LD might be better, but this was an early DVD, it could have been a direct port
avatar
That release is important though because it poked a hole in the argument that the previous HD transfer was the "correct" timing. I remember that there were people who said it was wrong, they were lambasted by others, how could the film have possibly been so teal? I reiterate, just because a remaster is flawed doesn't make the previous master any more accurate.
avatar
The DVD is from the early days of that companies DVD days...
avatar
Mhm... I wonder if the corresponding LD is a bit better... Not in color, but the technical transfer itself...
avatar
... and they did not had Mr. 'Best transfer' in the world done it... Or so. Smile
avatar
looking for the NTSC 3:2
avatar
and was trying to manually IVTC it
avatar
I only noticed the pattern because I totally forgot it was PAL
avatar
I'd believe it. Maybe the equipment was not properly calibrated
avatar
because if the source really is a German print, then that's the only thing that can explain a repeating pattern
avatar
they just could not resolve well with the technology of the era. Heck, it takes a lot of work on our part to get them to resolve well in HD
avatar
"Euro Pulldown with a missing field" is my working hypothesis at the moment
avatar
Yeah. The good thing is it's a theatrical print. The bad thing is it's a theatrical print
avatar
perhaps nicer than the open matte LD
avatar
It's pure luck it even exists. It's good it does but as a home video transfer it looks subpar
avatar
lol
avatar
Maybe it is a secret code... The master guy was imprisoned in the company, and he tried to communicate via strange Interlacing and pull downs... Big Grin
avatar
The ones that came from dual-subtitled prints with cigarette burns and everything
avatar
it reminds me of those awful Hong Kong home video transfers of the 80s
avatar
It is a shit transfer too, it is proof positive why it was mostly a BAD idea to telecine from a positive meant for theatrical projection. It may preserve the theatrical color in some respect, but it's skewed and washed out nonetheless
avatar
I wonder if it's Euro pulldown with a field dropped
avatar
it's repeatable
avatar
I have an MKV of his attempt. Maybe he still has the avs script lying around
avatar
there's a pattern in there
avatar
I think we can definitely get it back to progressive.
avatar
somehow he was able to sync it with the LD mono
avatar
It is a weird weird transfer
avatar
Chewtobacca tried to deinterlace it for me once. Some frames still had artifacts
avatar
it's hard, zoidberg
avatar
it's just so… weird
avatar
Is it hard/soft telecine? Could be the frame flagging
avatar
Agreed
avatar
I don't dispute you but it makes no sense whatsoever for it to have been transferred in NTSC.
avatar
Again it makes no sense, this is a German print. It has the optical overlay of the distributor over the Orion logo
avatar
I find that particularly strange
avatar
The active picture area is 480 lines high
avatar
With PAL speed up.