2015-05-27, 02:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 2015-05-27, 02:43 PM by jerryshadoe.)
Those of us that have worked on various projects have, at some point, had to deal with de-interlacing interlaced footage. Now there are numerous different ways of doing this, with some rather decent results to complete nightmares. All of this is usually dependent on the resolution of the video, the bitrate (the lower it is the more macro-blocking/noise/artefacts get introduced) and the Codec used (mostly MPEG2). I don't want to discuss the various methods as everyones "mileage will vary" depending on numerous factors.
However, while working on the "Something Evil" project, that finally has a new source (more in this thread) I noticed something in the de-interlaced footage. (I was using TDeint in Avidemux 2.5 exporting using Huffyuv)
I really like the real-time preview in Sony Vegas of multiple different video source on a frame-by-frame basis that is extremely easy to navigate. This is how I noticed that the footage that I de-interlaced (top-field-first) on many scene/shot change would have a chroma-bleed of frame A into frame B or chroma-bleed of frame B into frame A, at various spots, interchangeable, with no particular pattern. I thought to myself, "what if I reverse the field order when de-interlacing the footage?" The result is now that the chroma-bleeds happen at EXACT opposite frames, therefore, each frame can be salvaged.
Andrea suggested screenshot comparisons and this is a great idea
frame 84694 and comparison between de-interlaced top-field-first and bottom-field-first:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/128834
frame 84695, same comparison as last frame, but you can see the chroma-bleed reversal in relation to choosing different first field:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/128836
frame 3851 was chosen here for a few reasons... it is NOT at a scene change and shows how more detail is brought out by overlaying the bottom-field-first at 50% over the top-field-first helps produce a slightly sharper image as all horizontal info from both fields in present in the single progressive frame instead of just half (granted, at this lower resolution the difference is not as big, but I suspect this could help a lot with HD sources)... especially noticeable in the "for sale" sign and phone number underneath
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/128837
So... yeah, just some weird stuff I noticed. With this particular source, I noticed this problem with almost every de-interlacing method I tried and the same difference when altering first-field order...
However, while working on the "Something Evil" project, that finally has a new source (more in this thread) I noticed something in the de-interlaced footage. (I was using TDeint in Avidemux 2.5 exporting using Huffyuv)
I really like the real-time preview in Sony Vegas of multiple different video source on a frame-by-frame basis that is extremely easy to navigate. This is how I noticed that the footage that I de-interlaced (top-field-first) on many scene/shot change would have a chroma-bleed of frame A into frame B or chroma-bleed of frame B into frame A, at various spots, interchangeable, with no particular pattern. I thought to myself, "what if I reverse the field order when de-interlacing the footage?" The result is now that the chroma-bleeds happen at EXACT opposite frames, therefore, each frame can be salvaged.
Andrea suggested screenshot comparisons and this is a great idea
frame 84694 and comparison between de-interlaced top-field-first and bottom-field-first:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/128834
frame 84695, same comparison as last frame, but you can see the chroma-bleed reversal in relation to choosing different first field:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/128836
frame 3851 was chosen here for a few reasons... it is NOT at a scene change and shows how more detail is brought out by overlaying the bottom-field-first at 50% over the top-field-first helps produce a slightly sharper image as all horizontal info from both fields in present in the single progressive frame instead of just half (granted, at this lower resolution the difference is not as big, but I suspect this could help a lot with HD sources)... especially noticeable in the "for sale" sign and phone number underneath
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/128837
So... yeah, just some weird stuff I noticed. With this particular source, I noticed this problem with almost every de-interlacing method I tried and the same difference when altering first-field order...