2016-05-05, 01:42 PM
So I'm thinking of getting a flatbed film scanner for telecine work. What model would you recommend?
|
Flatbed film scanner
|
Posts: 459
Threads: 35 Joined: 2015 Oct Thanks: 1
Given 22 thank(s) in 19 post(s) Country: 
Posts: 459
Threads: 35 Joined: 2015 Oct Thanks: 1
Given 22 thank(s) in 19 post(s) Country:
2016-05-05, 07:46 PM
I'm considering getting the Epson Perfection V550, but if there's any better scanner for telecine, let me know.
Posts: 459
Threads: 35 Joined: 2015 Oct Thanks: 1
Given 22 thank(s) in 19 post(s) Country:
2016-05-05, 08:27 PM
Well hold that thought....
http://petapixel.com/2012/12/23/why-you-...a-scanner/ But that kind of camera would require me to shell out ten times as much! ...I need a miracle. 
Posts: 1,246
Threads: 12 Joined: 2015 Oct Thanks: 267
Given 393 thank(s) in 257 post(s) Country: 
2016-05-05, 08:42 PM
(2016-05-05, 08:27 PM)FrankT Wrote: Well hold that thought.... Uh.. great idea using a DSLR. Too bad the good ones are quite expensive.  only have a small one with crop sensor.I just wonder how much time that would need. First of all shooting each frame seperatly. Would it be someway automatic with a flatbed scanner, or would it also need to process each frame? Sorry. I would like to help with informations regarding scanner.. but that is completely out of my knowledge, I do not own anything on Film.
"Never cut a deal with a dragon..."
- Old Shadowrun wisdom
Posts: 459
Threads: 35 Joined: 2015 Oct Thanks: 1
Given 22 thank(s) in 19 post(s) Country:
Well I'm thinking using something like the Kinograph uses. CineToVidPro in particular.
Here's a piece on the flatbed telecine process.
Posts: 459
Threads: 35 Joined: 2015 Oct Thanks: 1
Given 22 thank(s) in 19 post(s) Country:
2016-05-11, 06:42 PM
Well, never mind. I've ordered my V550, and I'll get to test it out tomorrow. Since I don't have any expertise in circuitry I can't build an advancer for the film to go through, so I'll have to do it by hand. Which will take longer, but it's easier. Now, let's see.... anything else?
Posts: 1,746
Threads: 73 Joined: 2015 Mar Thanks: 351
Given 313 thank(s) in 141 post(s) Country: 
2016-05-11, 09:34 PM
But why would you do that? A feature film is like 200000 frames and this model's fastest scanning speed is 30 seconds per frame. That's 1666 hours to scan ONE film and that doesn't include the time you'd need for advancing the frames manually, managing your output images etc. Not to mention that, unwinding the film by hand, you would inevitably scratch it up or even break it.
I don't want do be rude, but unless you're planning to use it to scan your own negatives (the photography ones, whatever they're called in English) and photos, you should cancel the purchase and save the money and trouble.
Posts: 459
Threads: 35 Joined: 2015 Oct Thanks: 1
Given 22 thank(s) in 19 post(s) Country:
I don't really have any other choice! A proper film scanner would cost far more than I have! I'm surprised you do not share this sentiment. I have to do restoration on the cheap, like!
Posts: 1,746
Threads: 73 Joined: 2015 Mar Thanks: 351
Given 313 thank(s) in 141 post(s) Country:
2016-05-11, 10:38 PM
Why do you need this scanner anyway? Do you have some movie to scan? If that's the case then surely your money would be used better by paying a professional.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Decoding AC3 tracks from film ? | Mediahead | 11 | 5,902 |
2022-04-05, 02:13 PM Last Post: stwd4nder2 |
|
| Building a film scanner | poita | 30 | 25,362 |
2018-11-27, 07:34 PM Last Post: deleted user |
|
| Kinograph - 8/16/35mm open source film scanner | Colek | 6 | 9,194 |
2016-05-05, 08:03 PM Last Post: MrBrown |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)