Posts: 1,202
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 823
Given 371 thank(s) in 240 post(s)
Im not really familiar with Digital Projection in cinemas.
If it's anything like Post Production / Home Theatre, even calibrated equipment is going to have it's differences.
How much of a variation (even slight) does a transfer from other mediums yield a correction from our community?
I used to think Digital would narrow this somewhat, but I'm very wrong.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country: 
Posts: 1,202
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 823
Given 371 thank(s) in 240 post(s)
Posts: 1,202
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 823
Given 371 thank(s) in 240 post(s)
2017-07-26, 10:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 2017-07-26, 10:51 PM by CSchmidlapp.)
It might get to the point where we get 'log' scans of the negative and apply our own LUT's depending on viewing circumstances.
It would come with a 'Director's Approved' set of parameters as a standard, but also variations to match monitoring equipment used.
This would also contain Aspect Ratio Variations with Pan and Scan Metadata where applicable.
Posts: 2,127
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 164
Given 1058 thank(s) in 645 post(s)
I've just posted a thread in the technical sub-forum which may help us cast light on this particular issue.
Posts: 41
Threads: 0
Joined: 2017 Apr
Thanks: 19
Given 5 thank(s) in 5 post(s)
Country: 
Brilliant work! Had no idea hardcoded subs could be painted out so effectively either.
Posts: 360
Threads: 40
Joined: 2015 May
Thanks: 124
Given 119 thank(s) in 56 post(s)
Country: 
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
|
