Posts: 588
Threads: 44
Joined: 2021 Jul
Thanks: 429
Given 475 thank(s) in 234 post(s)
Country:
Fascinating read.
I've always found the history of surround formats interesting, and it's a shame that many early mixes are either lost or just unavailable and replaced by (often not great/revisionist) remixes.
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1465 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
The oldest the release, the more probable it contains original mix.
For example, laserdiscs usually retain untouched mixes, often not found in successive formats as DVD, HD-DVD, Blu-ray, UHD-BD. Still, some were available on DVD - especially early versions - even if nowaday, sometimes, they are also released on UHD-BD, but it's quite rare.
Posts: 2,510
Threads: 40
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2011
Given 429 thank(s) in 354 post(s)
Country:
Dolby always sought to copyright history and give it a brand.
Used to like them in the 90s.
Posts: 2,048
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 160
Given 1007 thank(s) in 611 post(s)
It's not surprising really, after all Dolby get a license fee for every commercial release in one of their formats. I don't know if they made a lot from hardware sales but theatre licensing was a significant revenue stream for them (which is famously why The Terminator and Evil Dead 2 were mono releases, the studios wouldn't pony up the extra cash). Once cinema went digital they stood to lose a lot of their revenue hence you got Dolby Cinema (Atmos, 3D, Vision). Had digital projection not taken over completely they might not have felt such an overwhelming urge to diversify.