Posts: 1,611
Threads: 44
Joined: 2017 Aug
Thanks: 189
Given 632 thank(s) in 378 post(s)
Country:
How about trying a 2.20:1 AR as if it was a scope film but presented in 70mm? You'd crop less for better composition when it looks too tight. Plus maybe the credits would no longer require these black pilars left and right.
Posts: 141
Threads: 6
Joined: 2017 Jun
Thanks: 62
Given 68 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Country:
I was toying with 2:20 idea but really want to bring it closer to rest of the LWs.
Posts: 1,611
Threads: 44
Joined: 2017 Aug
Thanks: 189
Given 632 thank(s) in 378 post(s)
Country:
2025-10-02, 02:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 2025-10-02, 03:00 AM by Beber.)
Or maybe start in 2.20:1, then progressively going 2.35:1 near the end of the opening credits to get rid of the pilars. You know, like in some IMAX presentations, such as "Mission: Impossible - Fallout", when they go progressively from 2.39:1 to 1.90:1. Since 2.20:1 and 2.35:1 are closer to each other, the change would go smoother and could virtually go unnoticed.
Also, are you using the Blu-ray or the UHD? It's the Blu-ray, right? Know that the UHD has a much closer color grading to an actual print. They only missed the mark in the climax where blues should be more cyan.
Posts: 141
Threads: 6
Joined: 2017 Jun
Thanks: 62
Given 68 thank(s) in 50 post(s)
Country:
Yes, using the Blu, as that version I already have. My PC rig is an old bucket that won't handle UHD or 265 and I haven't found a 264 1080p with new grading.
Still mulling over that part of credits. I'd really like to keep it old school, no variable AR. Have an idea to gradualy squeeze that part of credits vertically and bring it back after, haven't tried it yet.
Posts: 1,611
Threads: 44
Joined: 2017 Aug
Thanks: 189
Given 632 thank(s) in 378 post(s)
Country:
2025-10-03, 09:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 2025-10-04, 12:00 AM by Beber.)
New scan, color grading much more faithful to a 35mm print, in sync with previous master. Maybe an initial delay required, I don't remember. The one thing that might not help you is the framing is a bit tighter: we see a little bit less left and right and it's 1.85:1, so we see a little bit less top and bottom, too. And I noticed one shot where digital erasing was involved to remove a handful of crew members on the right side during the wake when Riggs waits in the yard while Murtaugh is speaking to his old Vietnam buddy.
Currently encoding. I set my brightness and contrast in RipBot264 to look as close as I could to the screen captures on Blu-ray.com that they took from the bonus documentary that uses the new transfer for illustration. So the result should be about on par with an official Rec.709 SDR version.