Posts: 501
Threads: 13
Joined: 2015 Mar
Thanks: 47
Given 77 thank(s) in 40 post(s)
Country:
Just buy yourself a 1080 one. 4K is useless. It's only great for shooting ans mastering and maybe archiving but when you know that a lot of movies these days are still mastered in 2K and that not all the theatres are equiped with 4K projectors... it makes you think about 4K TVs. Future proofing is a valid arguement though.
Posts: 2,541
Threads: 43
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2033
Given 442 thank(s) in 363 post(s)
Country:
I love my 4k TV and disc collection.
I also have a ton of the Sony downloads stored for non HDR posterity
Posts: 2,051
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 162
Given 1011 thank(s) in 614 post(s)
Are the sony downloads 10bit colour dvdmike?
Posts: 2,541
Threads: 43
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2033
Given 442 thank(s) in 363 post(s)
Country:
That's a good question, will check when I get 5
Posts: 157
Threads: 14
Joined: 2015 Feb
Thanks: 2
Given 1 thank(s) in 1 post(s)
I can't resist, don't buy 4K until the sources are 4K or 8K and there are very few sources in 4K/8K currently.
Posts: 157
Threads: 14
Joined: 2015 Feb
Thanks: 2
Given 1 thank(s) in 1 post(s)
I prefer 1080p until we have very good 4K/8K releases and because we don't have very good 1080p releases, there is no reason to consider 4K/8K releases yet.
Color is a different issue than resolution, however, while HDR can be good, its more marketing than anything.
Posts: 2,051
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 162
Given 1011 thank(s) in 614 post(s)
There's a lot of talk online on how UHD blu rays have better grain preservation than 1080p blu rays, even on 2K 'upscales' which should look identical.
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
Don't forget that 2K masters are scanned at 2048x1536/1556 pixels, so anamorphic prints would be noticeably better than final 1080p resolution of 1920x800/820 - and not-anamorphic prints would be a bit better as well.