Posts: 2,799
Threads: 49
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2244
Given 502 thank(s) in 415 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 1,291
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 301
Given 417 thank(s) in 273 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 2,799
Threads: 49
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2244
Given 502 thank(s) in 415 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 1,291
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 301
Given 417 thank(s) in 273 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 5,153
Threads: 182
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3569
Given 3251 thank(s) in 1367 post(s)
Country:
Btw I was listening to film podcast and one of the guys in it went to the same showing you did Falcon.
Now he didn't offer any thoughts about the color but did say being QTs personal print that it didn't even have the Miramax logo. I found that interesting.
Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1012 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
2017-05-22, 08:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-05-22, 08:59 AM by Stamper.)
Hi man, willing to help, maybe we can add a few subs in here. I think I can provide french subs and maybe mixes if you don't have them.
I think both fullscreen discs, french & US, are close to the look of the film you're trying to get. You can reference them, but as far as I'm concerned, your caps look perfect.
Posts: 9
Threads: 2
Joined: 2017 May
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Country:
I dunno why they bothered mixing this into 6.1 don't think I heard surrounds once id rather hear in org mix. looks much better tho
Posts: 1,000
Threads: 71
Joined: 2015 Mar
Thanks: 2213
Given 982 thank(s) in 395 post(s)
Country:
2017-06-19, 07:46 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-06-19, 06:47 PM by The Aluminum Falcon.)
Apologies, this project took longer than expected. But, now, it's available in the usual places! Updated original post with new screenshots.
I did decide, after all, to include the original theatrical mix from the US LD as the primary audio. It's a good track and, for those of you that prefer the remix, I retained the JP BD's 5.1 Dolby True HD sound.
It is a fairly radical departure from the Blu-Ray look with much deeper contrast. Saturation and yellow cast isn't quite as pushed as I had in my initial test photos; flesh tones were a bit too much in my first version, and I'm not sure if the bulb was causing the print to appear overly warm. I was hesitant to amp up the yellows as much as I did, especially considering I could find no home video releases, foreign or otherwise, to support what I saw. Regardless, I may do a possible V2 in the future where the yellows are stronger.
The primary references were photos I took during the screening (slightly off due to auto-white balancing and the obvious low-light conditions), as well an open matte Russian DVD, whose contrast matched what I saw dead-on. My memory was also used as a secondary source, which actually is fairly legitimate, if I may declare in this case, considering that I started color-correcting an hour after I saw Tarantino's print.
The project's subtitle, once "Color Timing Restoration," has now been changed to "Tarantino's 35mm Print Reconstruction." I have no proof that this was the 1992 theatrical look.
---
On an entirely separate note, that's a very cool anecdote from Stamper about the intended aspect ratio! I love the film, but framing does seem unnaturally tight a lot of the time. This was particularly evident on the big screen.
So inspiring was this anecdote that I've also uploaded a little side-project... Reservoir Dogs (1992): Open Matte Sundance Premiere Reconstruction!
a 1080p upconversion of a PAL open matte DVD with 35mm grain plate, synced LD theatrical audio, and just a tad bit of color-correcting. Wasn't trying to aim for the look of Tarantino's print this time 'round, merely a warm, balanced look as the PAL DVD has the slightest of blue pushes.
The PAL DVD has an interesting palette with many varied hues, including teals not seen in other transfers. The color is decidedly not like the one at Tribeca, but interesting nevertheless. However, the contrast is pretty similar, also bringing out the film's shadowy look. As mentioned before, it's entirely possible that Tarantino's print is unique, and I could picture a theatrical (or even the premiere) print actually looking very much like this.
Screenshots:
- Comparison with JP BD -
JP BD
![[Image: 1.png]](https://s11.postimg.cc/9650dqef7/1.png)
Premiere Reconstruction
JP BD
![[Image: 2.png]](https://s11.postimg.cc/ci7wkrvk3/2.png)
Premiere Reconstruction
JP BD
![[Image: 3.png]](https://s11.postimg.cc/5dq3bqoar/3.png)
Premiere Reconstruction
- Standalone Screenshots -
Hopefully, this gives as some semblance of Reservoir Dogs looked like in its premiere. Whichever release ends up gracing your screens, I hope you'll agree with me that Reservoir Dogs is far from the bland looking movie the BD would have us believe.
Welcome any thoughts, as always.
That being said, this is my last custom release for a bit, but may consider doing a V2 of both a few months from now depending if there is particularly strong feedback on the questions below:
- For Tarantino's 35mm Print Reconstruction, I wonder if I could have pushed the warmer tones a bit farther. It would be pushed a bit more like my initial screenshots while still keeping a careful eye on the flesh tones.
- For the Open Matte Premiere Reconstruction, I wonder if there's another release with more images on the side... perhaps the French DVD mentioned last page?
Regardless, enjoy! 
Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1012 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
2017-06-19, 09:33 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-06-19, 09:35 AM by Stamper.)
Cool, the open matte screening was Sundance, not Cannes. You may want to rename your release! Didn't I MP you the french disc?
Posts: 1,974
Threads: 54
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 272
Given 401 thank(s) in 252 post(s)
Country:
2017-06-19, 10:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-06-19, 10:20 AM by Evit.)
I recently digitalized the Italian VHS that was struck directly from 35mm (a recent purchase of mine). If you think it might be useful as color reference...
|