Posts: 4,980
Threads: 173
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 2974
Given 2855 thank(s) in 1255 post(s)
Country:
Looks great Falcon. You are really busting these out!
Posts: 2,623
Threads: 44
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1530
Given 912 thank(s) in 582 post(s)
2017-06-20, 12:27 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-06-20, 12:29 AM by Stamper.)
Nope not the DP. Tarantino rewrote a bit what happened at the catastrophic premiere. If you take the open matte and matte it to 1.77 you can see the movie plays perfect. It was shot for 1.85:1. Somehow he decided after the premiere that it was full scope botching many compositions in the end but giving the film a more epic feel.
I'm guessing he was unsure until his back was on the wall.
The talk about anamorphic is bullshit, the movie is shot with spherical lenses so there were never anamorphic prints like for anamorphic films. Why would the theater be not able to zoom in or matte an open matte print? Every theater does that.
Posts: 953
Threads: 65
Joined: 2015 Mar
Thanks: 1979
Given 849 thank(s) in 354 post(s)
Country:
Thanks, guys! Excuse the mistake about Cannes v. Sundance. Fixed all posts.
Posts: 2,623
Threads: 44
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1530
Given 912 thank(s) in 582 post(s)
Yes but that print couldn't be anamorphic because Tarantino says it exposed all kind of stuff in the frame not supposed to be seen.
He's scrambling eggs!
Posts: 1,096
Threads: 26
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 652
Given 294 thank(s) in 196 post(s)
Any more information on the French open matte?
Posts: 1,234
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 252
Given 385 thank(s) in 250 post(s)
Country:
Once there were some screens online showing the differences between the French open matte and the Canadian open Matte DVD.
After the first 1.33:1 DVD newer full frame DVDs were not open matted, but pan and scan.
"Never cut a deal with a dragon..."
- Old Shadowrun wisdom