Hello guest, if you like this forum, why don't you register? https://fanrestore.com/member.php?action=register (December 14, 2021) x


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
UHD BD to BD?
M:I-2 comparison between:

AVC Blu-ray/NRJ12 French broadcasting/My current RipBot conversion of the UHD:

[Image: rgcl.jpg]
[Image: u01c.jpg]
[Image: n6zc.jpg]

[Image: vhms.jpg]
[Image: jmx6.jpg]
[Image: chc7.jpg]

[Image: scqc.jpg]
[Image: u721.jpg]
[Image: d25e.jpg]

[Image: 4c4d.jpg]
[Image: 8jco.jpg]
[Image: kj2k.jpg]

[Image: m0qy.jpg]
[Image: dlwr.jpg]
[Image: ribk.jpg]

[Image: a40r.jpg]
[Image: l7tj.jpg]
[Image: nzfj.jpg]

[Image: p5yl.jpg]
[Image: eveu.jpg]
[Image: rle9.jpg]

[Image: v6r9.jpg]
[Image: l9jf.jpg]
[Image: sh2o.jpg]

[Image: r86t.jpg]
[Image: 1ypu.jpg]
[Image: i50e.jpg]

[Image: mqib.jpg]
[Image: qgi6.jpg]
[Image: dca0.jpg]

[Image: fblj.jpg]
[Image: un5l.jpg]
[Image: gpqb.jpg]

This one is also all over the place in terms of color. Very inconsistent.
Reply
Thanks given by:
This is where I am right now with M:I-3:

AVC Blu-ray/RipBot conversion (0, 1, -1, 1)

[Image: ndcz.jpg]
[Image: qpz4.jpg]

[Image: 4i1v.jpg]
[Image: o4i2.jpg]

[Image: euar.jpg]
[Image: usjb.jpg]

[Image: 1hi5.jpg]
[Image: c6mb.jpg]

[Image: 9suz.jpg]
[Image: eubf.jpg]

[Image: 9c5f.jpg]
[Image: 0bpa.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
This is what I obtain with The Matrix. In many scenes, the remastered Blu-ray looks overexposed and thus the highlights are blown. The UHD does not suffer from that.

Remastered Blu-ray / RipBot default conversion from UHD

[Image: qqb9.jpg]
[Image: f6hk.jpg]

[Image: ov37.jpg]
[Image: yjzy.jpg]

[Image: o12r.jpg]
[Image: vfxl.jpg]
Here, the remastered Blu-ray is quite dead on with my 35mm experience. The RipBot conversion makes a way too green wall.

[Image: zw98.jpg]
[Image: s34h.jpg]

[Image: aib7.jpg]
[Image: tj33.jpg]
Blown highlights on the remastered Blu-ray. More details on the UHD.

[Image: w8yh.jpg]
[Image: friw.jpg]
Richer colors on the remastered Blu-ray.

[Image: 403j.jpg]
[Image: z9mt.jpg]
For this example, I'm adding the old Blu-ray. I don't really like the way the remaster looks inside the Nebuchadnezzar. Too much pink and green eyes, even the white part of the eyes turn to a greenish blue, maybe as a result of screen reflection 'cause it shows a lot on Tank's eyes. But I think, overall, I like the Nebuchadnezzar scenes better on the old master.
[Image: zluv.jpg]

[Image: adg2.jpg]
[Image: uvqa.jpg]
Too bright on the roof scene on the remastered Blu-ray. The UHD is not that blown and shows more details.

[Image: 9s5x.jpg]
[Image: s7gj.jpg]

[Image: uj3s.jpg]
[Image: 4yhb.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by: CSchmidlapp
The grading on the Nebuchadnezzar scenes are a bit of a head scratch for me also.
They look truly bizarre to my eyes.
Ive only viewed it converted to 8bit rec.720 but I still think its a little off.
Reply
Thanks given by:
(2018-07-13, 12:01 AM)CSchmidlapp Wrote: The grading on the Nebuchadnezzar scenes are a bit of a head scratch for me also.
They look truly bizarre to my eyes.
Ive only viewed it converted to 8bit rec.720 but I still think its a little off.

I know, right? And I cannot comment on the actual HDR look 'cause I'm not equiped either. But these scenes do look strange on the remaster. I think they look healthier on the old master. I cannot recall which is more accurate, though.
Reply
Thanks given by:
It could be cool to do a patchwork version, using the best from all the four versions.
Reply
Thanks given by:
Don't forget the 4K remaster has been graded to look as 'originally intended' as opposed to how it was presented theatrically.
Reply
Thanks given by:
Here's what I get with Harry Potter #1.

Blu-ray / UHD RipBot conversion set on Default:

[Image: 6b9t.jpg]
[Image: xxf9.jpg]

[Image: 1u5q.jpg]
[Image: elzd.jpg]

[Image: 09zc.jpg]
[Image: o6ct.jpg]

[Image: loc9.jpg]
[Image: 28ud.jpg]

[Image: o6nw.jpg]
[Image: gfop.jpg]

[Image: 41r1.jpg]
[Image: kqqw.jpg]

[Image: 5o8q.jpg]
[Image: yzyk.jpg]

[Image: 56y5.jpg]
[Image: xj16.jpg]

[Image: d6mk.jpg]
[Image: yt7h.jpg]

[Image: ozqu.jpg]
[Image: 891f.jpg]

[Image: 0xfe.jpg]
[Image: ungq.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
Here's what I get with Predator. That looks about right: not as red, darker, more filmlike.

Blu-ray 2008 / Blu-ray 2010 / UHD RipBot conversion (Default settings except for saturation, boosted a little bit from 1.0 to 1.1)

[Image: 9wyn.jpg]
[Image: ur5u.jpg]
[Image: 4qzm.jpg]

[Image: 4lbb.jpg]
[Image: 5k54.jpg]
[Image: 5car.jpg]

[Image: txb1.jpg]
[Image: u9d7.jpg]
[Image: 88pn.jpg]

[Image: a23p.jpg]
[Image: hqgo.jpg]
[Image: laeb.jpg]

[Image: o7u7.jpg]
[Image: osme.jpg]
[Image: 6sox.jpg]

[Image: v6ya.jpg]
[Image: m944.jpg]
[Image: 7iat.jpg]

[Image: j00k.jpg]
[Image: 8ypb.jpg]
[Image: onyc.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:
Just finished a veryslow 2 pass grain high bitrate using default of Predator myself. Lovely transfer. All that grain is beautiful. Anyone know the delay needed for the PCM 2.0 laserdisc sound.

[Image: tmdoEOW.jpg]
[Image: w4v7Qny.jpg]
Reply
Thanks given by:


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)