Hello guest, if you like this forum, why don't you register? https://fanrestore.com/member.php?action=register (December 14, 2021) x


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Point Break (1991) Original Dolby Surround 2.0 Mix and 4.1 mix
#21
I was feeling a bit nostalgic about Point Break, so I came across this thread in a search for the best source for original audio to watch it with.

First of all, thanks dwalkerdon, for providing the DVD track, I'll compare them to the ones on the Pure Adrenalin Edition BD.

Has anyone got any concrete information on the LD PCM track? Withouht it, I belive the 4.0 on the BD should be the best option, right?
Reply
Thanks given by:
#22
To follow up on my previous post, I compared these tracks to the FOX BD DTS-HD MA 5.1 and 4.0 tracks on audacity.

The multichanel mixes themselves are very similar, if not the same. The DVD 4.1 is basically the BD 4.0 with bass extracted to a separate chanel and the 5.1 splits the surrounds in two chanels with the same information (in other words, it's mono surround)

So the main difference is in the dynamics and they are significant. The BD 4.0 is clearly the worst, with compressed dynamics and high frequencies roll off. The 5.1 is much better in these regards.

The DVD tracks seem to be the best, showcasing even higher dynamics than the 5.1 lossless track.

Thanks again dwalkerdon for these great tracks!
Reply
Thanks given by: dwalkerdon
#23
(2020-05-24, 07:28 AM)BDgeek Wrote: To follow up on my previous post, I compared these tracks to the FOX BD DTS-HD MA 5.1 and 4.0 tracks on audacity.

The multichanel mixes themselves are very similar, if not the same. The DVD 4.1 is basically the BD 4.0 with bass extracted to a separate chanel and the 5.1 splits the surrounds in two chanels with the same information (in other words, it's mono surround)

So the main difference is in the dynamics and they are significant. The BD 4.0 is clearly the worst, with compressed dynamics and high frequencies roll off. The 5.1 is much better in these regards.

The DVD tracks seem to be the best, showcasing even higher dynamics than the 5.1 lossless track.

Thanks again dwalkerdon for these great tracks!
Good information. It's still possible the BD 4.0 is pretty much the original theatrical mix and digital jiggery-pokery is responsible for the 5.1's enhancements.
That still doesn't mean the 5.1 track probably isn't better, but there are people that prefer 'faithful' to 'improved'.

Although I believe the newer BD has more compression on the video so it fits on BD25 with the previous release being a BD50.
Reply
Thanks given by: BDgeek
#24
Thanks Doctor M!

I do believe the DVD tracks are not only more faithful but also better sounding.

The Fox BD indeed has better compressoin, this can be objectively preceived on the caps-a-holic comparison. However, since the original master seems to come from an old scan, looking very soft and possibly filtered, the differences are not all that great. So, the FOX BD is still the superior presentation so far.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#25
Are you saying the DVD's 4.0 (4.1?) track is better than the BD 4.0 track? At the very least you'd expect identical.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#26
Is there a PCM 2.0 LD capture around?
Reply
Thanks given by:
#27
(2020-05-25, 10:28 PM)Doctor M Wrote: Are you saying the DVD's 4.0 (4.1?) track is better than the BD 4.0 track?  At the very least you'd expect identical.

Yes indeed DoctoM, the dynamics are significantly higher.

Since the DVD 4.1 is already available here, if anyone is interested on the BD 4.0 I can provide it. The delay is +440ms for the DVD tracks to sync with the FOX Pure Adrenalin Edition
Reply
Thanks given by: Doctor M , Stamper
#28
(2018-08-10, 11:01 PM)bendermac Wrote: 4.1 orignal mix? I highly doubt that.
It's either a 4.0 mix, mixed into a 2 channel layout onto an optical track or a 6 track for 70mm projection, which usually was 5 front channels and 1 back channel. Please correct me if I'm wrong. But a 4.1 discrete mix was never in theaters for this particular movie.

4.1 (actually 4.2 but the two bass channels are identical) is the usual layout for the more modern Dolby Stereo 70mm.
Dolby Stereo 70mm was also available with split surrounds for a 5.1 layout but 5.1 Dolby Stereo films are a bit rarer, some of these films are Top Gun, Alien 3, Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, Apocalypse Now, Superman: The Movie, and The Black Cauldron.
[Image: 118946.png?1673149411]
Reply
Thanks given by: dwalkerdon
#29
Anyone know if the upcoming ShoutFactory 4k release will have the original 4.1 track?
Reply
Thanks given by:
#30
I see that the ShoutFactory 2k disc is going to have a DTS-HD MA 2.0 track. Fingers crossed...
So what is currently the best track, the DVD 4.1?
Reply
Thanks given by:


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Request] The films of Wong Kar Wai - original mixes NeonBible 18 7,395 2024-12-02, 11:44 PM
Last Post: PomSpitz
  Hitchcock original audio thread captainsolo 24 9,436 2024-10-05, 07:36 PM
Last Post: therobotdreamer
  [Help] Help: looking for... original version of Medium Cool GreedoNeverShot 0 309 2024-09-23, 10:49 PM
Last Post: GreedoNeverShot
  [Help] identifying encoded but unflagged matrixed surround mixes (2.0/4.0) - (5.1/6.1) kiyoakiwah 1 474 2024-08-09, 09:29 PM
Last Post: zoidberg
  [Request] Thelma & Louise [1991] LD [ML102410] xwmario 4 1,885 2024-07-11, 04:56 PM
Last Post: titanic
  [Request] Citizen Kane 1991 Turner Hi-Fi VHS mono James76 1 1,184 2024-03-13, 06:15 PM
Last Post: ifkg
  Excalibur (1981) - Original Mono Mix from US-LD bendermac 46 34,009 2024-02-09, 05:56 AM
Last Post: PomSpitz
  [Request] The Warriors (1979) Theatrical Original Mono brad86 8 2,296 2023-09-30, 05:25 PM
Last Post: marin888
  [Request] Nightmare Before Christmas (1993) Original Audio therobotdreamer 0 914 2023-08-24, 07:54 PM
Last Post: therobotdreamer
  [Request] To Live and Die in L.A (1985) Original Stereo therobotdreamer 6 2,240 2023-08-22, 11:36 PM
Last Post: captainsolo

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)