deleted user 
			
				Unregistered
				
				
			
	
	
		
 
Thanks: 
	Given  thank(s) in  post(s)
	 
 
	
	
		Just got into an argument over FLAC vs. lossy compression.
Was challenged to do a ABX test. 
Done:
   
I admit I don't know how the math behind this works, but this tool says I can tell a difference with 100% confidence between FLAC and 320kbps MP3. 
So maybe most people just have shitty sound hardware? I used a Fireface 800 with AKG K701 headphones.
Either way, eat this, haters! 
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,092
	Threads: 56
	Joined: 2016 Dec
	
Thanks: 163
	Given 1034 thank(s) in 628 post(s)
	 
 
	
	
		Is this aimed at anyone in particular Tom?
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
			deleted user 
			
				Unregistered
				
				
			
	
	
		
 
Thanks: 
	Given  thank(s) in  post(s)
	 
 
	
	
		 (2018-01-26, 03:17 PM)zoidberg Wrote:  Is this aimed at anyone in particular Tom?
Hahaha! I would be lying if I said I didn't recall our disagreement about DTS vs FLAC. 
But this happened independently over on Blutopia and I while my main argument basically always was that I'm a data hoarder and like the originals, I found the result of this test actually surprising (because I've read millions of articles about how 320kbps MP3 is transparent), so I found it would be interesting to share and discuss. 
The edgy words I used were for the giggles, not a malicious attack on you or anybody here.
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
			deleted user 
			
				Unregistered
				
				
			
	
	
		
 
Thanks: 
	Given  thank(s) in  post(s)
	 
 
	
	
		 (2018-01-26, 03:01 PM)spoRv Wrote:  
Of course a lot depends on you (hats off!) and your listening chain, but also by the encoder used!
That's probably definitely true. I only used the standard Adobe Audition encoder, maybe LAME would have done better I dunno.
	
 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,151
	Threads: 601
	Joined: 2015 Jan
	
Thanks: 1081
	Given 1490 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country: 
	 
 
	
	
		But I bet you will not be able to distinguish between WAV (FLAC) and DTS 1.5mbps...
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
			deleted user 
			
				Unregistered
				
				
			
	
	
		
 
Thanks: 
	Given  thank(s) in  post(s)
	 
 
	
	
		 (2018-01-26, 03:50 PM)zoidberg Wrote:   (2018-01-26, 03:20 PM)TomArrow Wrote:   (2018-01-26, 03:17 PM)zoidberg Wrote:  Is this aimed at anyone in particular Tom?
Hahaha! I would be lying if I said I didn't recall our disagreement about DTS vs FLAC. 
 That wasn't me
It was: 
https://fanrestore.com/thread-1857-post-...l#pid38475
No biggie though. I thought you were making a wink at me regarding that exchange, apparently not. 
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
			deleted user 
			
				Unregistered
				
				
			
	
	
		
 
Thanks: 
	Given  thank(s) in  post(s)
	 
 
	
	
		 (2018-01-26, 03:51 PM)spoRv Wrote:  But I bet you will not be able to distinguish between WAV (FLAC) and DTS 1.5mbps...
I am too cowardly to try 
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,092
	Threads: 56
	Joined: 2016 Dec
	
Thanks: 163
	Given 1034 thank(s) in 628 post(s)
	 
 
	
	
		That was hardly a disagreement Tom. Like I said at the time you won't be disappointed by full bit rate DTS. I thought you were referencing the conversation on the Armageddon thread.