Posts: 76
Threads: 18
Joined: 2020 Jan
Thanks: 79
Given 87 thank(s) in 25 post(s)
Country:
Just wondering what people think are the worst examples of remixes released for films, whether it be due to altered sound effects, musical cues or just noise reduction filtering that reduces noticeable detail. I wouidn't mind compiling a list of the most offensive examples, in order to avoid or source better audio.
Posts: 66
Threads: 24
Joined: 2020 Nov
Thanks: 29
Given 6 thank(s) in 5 post(s)
Country:
The Terminator, the 5.1 mix drasically has gunshots sound like silencers.
Posts: 5,044
Threads: 175
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3201
Given 2982 thank(s) in 1293 post(s)
Country:
Batman 89 and Returns on UHD were the first to come to mind.
Posts: 606
Threads: 45
Joined: 2021 Jul
Thanks: 458
Given 491 thank(s) in 243 post(s)
Country:
While not the worst remixes, all of Kubrick's films getting 5.1 mixes feels offensive considering he specifically targeted mono and avoided Dolby Stereo even though it was an option (EWS would probably be mono if he lived to do the sound mix). The fact that his estate allows this to happen, but we also can't see the pie fight in all it's glory is very annoying.
Also Jaws
Posts: 5,044
Threads: 175
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3201
Given 2982 thank(s) in 1293 post(s)
Country:
That reminds me of the 5.1s for Halloween. They have new effects mixed in.
Posts: 1,115
Threads: 26
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 696
Given 307 thank(s) in 208 post(s)
A Better Tomorrow.
Hands down the worst I've heard, for the same reasons above.
Posts: 233
Threads: 12
Joined: 2021 Oct
Thanks: 27
Given 39 thank(s) in 34 post(s)
Country:
Most of Clint Eastwood's 60-80s output.
Posts: 76
Threads: 18
Joined: 2020 Jan
Thanks: 79
Given 87 thank(s) in 25 post(s)
Country:
Oh my god. That's terrible. I thought studios were passed doing this for the most part. I understand them doing it back in DVD days because they wanted to show off fancy surround sound, but jeez, today?