2017-12-28, 01:32 AM
(2017-12-28, 01:25 AM)spoRv Wrote: Ethically, I agree that the "frankengrade" (oh, I love this neologism!) would not be, well, ethicand a 35mm regrade would be, still there are so many fan made regrade around, that one more would not hurt (I hope).
Well, fair enough. It's just that I personally don't care for such a thing, but that shall not stop you. To be honest, neither do I really care for a 35mm regrade, so my opinion doesn't really matter anymore at this point.

(2017-12-28, 01:25 AM)spoRv Wrote: But, bear with me, would you prefer a, let's say, 80% of the film regrade with 90% of accuracy, and 20% with 70% (due to forced use of lower quality matching script that do not produce artefacts), or 95% with 85% accuracy, and 5% that uses a different grading than film (namely, the interrogation scene so far)? Food for thought...
Hmm, the first. But as noted above, my opinion isn't really important if you're doing a film regrade.
(2017-12-28, 01:25 AM)spoRv Wrote: Yes, the open matte version could be surely regraded, and result *should* be nice; but the full screen has BD colors, so it would be hard to match both perfectly. Logo *may* fall within open matte, not sure, too lazy to compare...
Fair enough

(2017-12-28, 01:25 AM)spoRv Wrote: I don't think this one (http://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/46143/ERA-...Matrix-The) is open matte...
Didn't zoidberg rip some Matrix LD? Was that one Open Matte? I don't recall. But, hear my absolutely crazy idea: Blu Ray + Full Screen, regraded to Workprint (which I hear is also Full Screen? Didn't check). Logo removal with: Workprint.
