Posts: 444
Threads: 19
Joined: 2016 Feb
Thanks: 0
Given 42 thank(s) in 39 post(s)
Country:
2018-02-16, 06:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 2018-02-16, 06:58 PM by BronzeTitan.)
Sure! Only I'll use what looks like a scan, as opposed to a camera photo. Just check out the photos' "white" areas - anything but white, and not even uniformly not-white. For comparison, I'll continue to correct the Judgment version, to compare the previous settings to the new, independent settings to the particular shot (for which I must look around).
Posts: 1,107
Threads: 26
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 677
Given 303 thank(s) in 204 post(s)
Bar the Video master, the scan, digitizing, compositing, film out, all could add various amounts of inconstancy.
It was probably colour graded to a degree scene by scene during the process also.
Great work good sir.
Posts: 431
Threads: 27
Joined: 2015 May
Thanks: 61
Given 82 thank(s) in 68 post(s)
Country:
I don't recall it ever being mentioned, but is there anything useful in GitS 2.0 that could be used as a reference?
They may have monkeyed with a lot of scenes, but for anything they didn't should be well restored from the source.
Posts: 2,048
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 160
Given 1007 thank(s) in 611 post(s)
It would have definitely been colour timed which probably explains the 35mm's teal. Even Toy Story was colour timed despite being 100% filmout, by all accounts John Lasseter was somewhat clueless to the process. I'll find the video later.
The 2.0 is heavily cropped and regraded. I'm not sure if the composites (focus, movement of layers etc.) have been altered in any way from the original. One watch was enough for me
Posts: 2,048
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 160
Given 1007 thank(s) in 611 post(s)
Here's the video I mentioned earlier: