Posts: 5,097
Threads: 178
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3350
Given 3110 thank(s) in 1333 post(s)
Country:
Looks great Falcon. You are really busting these out!
Posts: 2,726
Threads: 49
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1726
Given 979 thank(s) in 624 post(s)
2017-06-20, 12:27 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-06-20, 12:29 AM by Stamper.)
Nope not the DP. Tarantino rewrote a bit what happened at the catastrophic premiere. If you take the open matte and matte it to 1.77 you can see the movie plays perfect. It was shot for 1.85:1. Somehow he decided after the premiere that it was full scope botching many compositions in the end but giving the film a more epic feel.
I'm guessing he was unsure until his back was on the wall.
The talk about anamorphic is bullshit, the movie is shot with spherical lenses so there were never anamorphic prints like for anamorphic films. Why would the theater be not able to zoom in or matte an open matte print? Every theater does that.
Posts: 978
Threads: 70
Joined: 2015 Mar
Thanks: 2133
Given 952 thank(s) in 387 post(s)
Country:
Thanks, guys! Excuse the mistake about Cannes v. Sundance. Fixed all posts.
Posts: 2,726
Threads: 49
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1726
Given 979 thank(s) in 624 post(s)
Yes but that print couldn't be anamorphic because Tarantino says it exposed all kind of stuff in the frame not supposed to be seen.
He's scrambling eggs!
Posts: 1,158
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 758
Given 352 thank(s) in 229 post(s)
Any more information on the French open matte?
Posts: 1,267
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 276
Given 403 thank(s) in 264 post(s)
Country:
Once there were some screens online showing the differences between the French open matte and the Canadian open Matte DVD.
After the first 1.33:1 DVD newer full frame DVDs were not open matted, but pan and scan.
"Never cut a deal with a dragon..."
- Old Shadowrun wisdom