Posts: 2,511
Threads: 40
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2013
Given 430 thank(s) in 355 post(s)
Country:
Depends who mastered it, same with Face/Off with both companies
Posts: 2,680
Threads: 46
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1630
Given 935 thank(s) in 600 post(s)
I suppose all the edit problems will still be there (including the waking up from the platform scene).
Posts: 1,008
Threads: 33
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 736
Given 414 thank(s) in 260 post(s)
It’s Paramount so we will beyond lucky if it it a hands off 4k master of the exact Blu-ray edit. Knowing them it will fubared to hell in DNR and disc mastering either with or without the same mono that’s been reused from the LD over and over. No new extras and most or some of the DVD legacy extras ported.
That darn ending music cue problem will likely never be fixed.
Damn Fool Idealistic Crusader
Posts: 2,511
Threads: 40
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2013
Given 430 thank(s) in 355 post(s)
Country:
Best bet is an untouchables level
Posts: 1,008
Threads: 33
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 736
Given 414 thank(s) in 260 post(s)
I’m still waiting for mine to ship on street date but basically:
DNR applied throughout, different more saturated color timing, no touching of the audio ending error so I assume it’s the Blu-ray audio recycled but likely hit with noise reduction or processing. The lossy mono will be the same bd source which was just a lossy version of the LD pcm with the same inherent defects.
But to make matters worse it’s shoved into a BD-66 so there’s compression artifacts everywhere.
Why Paramount why? I’ve been dreading this release for exactly these reasons.
And they have the audacity to charge $40 when the UHD film size is like 56gb and the streaming 4K version is 83 or so.
Damn Fool Idealistic Crusader