Posts: 444
Threads: 19
Joined: 2016 Feb
Thanks: 0
Given 42 thank(s) in 39 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 1
Threads: 0
Joined: 2018 Aug
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 51
Threads: 4
Joined: 2018 Jan
Thanks: 2
Given 36 thank(s) in 9 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 51
Threads: 4
Joined: 2018 Jan
Thanks: 2
Given 36 thank(s) in 9 post(s)
Country:
2018-08-03, 06:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 2018-08-03, 06:39 PM by 44rh1n.)
To be more specific about the framerates I'm able to capture with my Roku boxes, here's what I'm able to do: 1080p60i and 1080p30p on my Roku 3, and 1080p24 on my Roku Ultra (but the colors are super dark on the Ultra). I don't think any of these are ideal for a preservation. I need a streaming box that won't produce a color shift, and can record at 1080p23.976. Any leads?
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
A few thoughts:
- Have you checked whether you actually get duplicate frames when recording at 24p? It's thinkable that it does record 23.976 frame-by-frame and merely writes it down as 24p in the metadata, in which case you could just change the framerate and have the stream in good condition.
- If you record at 24p, you should, in theory, only get duplicate frames every now and then. To be more precise, I think you would get 1 duplicate frame roughly every 40 seconds. You shouldn't have any frame drops, since the source would be "playing slower" than the capturing device. *At least*, that is what my brain is concluding at this moment, feel free to point out errors in that reasoning. But if that is correct, then, with enough patience (or a good AviSynth script) you should be able to eliminate those duplicate frames and end up with a good recording.
- You could always get one of those professional capture things they use for recording camera output in the field. They take a HDMI/SDI stream as-is and just encode it in DNxHD/ProRes/something and save it.
Posts: 51
Threads: 4
Joined: 2018 Jan
Thanks: 2
Given 36 thank(s) in 9 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 51
Threads: 4
Joined: 2018 Jan
Thanks: 2
Given 36 thank(s) in 9 post(s)
Country:
Quick update: It's looking like both the 1080p30 and 1080i60 footage will convert cleanly to 1080p23.976. The 1080p24 footage is super wonky though, and doesn't convert well for me. The frames don't line up with the official Blu-ray. So I think tonight I'll try capturing the entire film in 1080p30 and see how it works.
Posts: 51
Threads: 4
Joined: 2018 Jan
Thanks: 2
Given 36 thank(s) in 9 post(s)
Country:
2018-08-06, 11:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 2018-08-06, 11:43 PM by 44rh1n.)
Posts: 730
Threads: 114
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 278
Given 765 thank(s) in 309 post(s)
Country:
Could you post some BD/Netflix comparison shots from later in the movie? Say, for example, the Council of Elrond.
I'm asking because I've compared the BD to the HDTV capture (which appears to be the same as the Netflix rip) and I can only see a difference in the above scene with Gandalf and Bilbo as well as the scene where Gandalf and Saruman try to out-Wiz each other. As far as I can tell, for all other scenes in the movie, the BD has equal or more visible grain to the capture. I don't know why they would DNR just those two scenes for the BD but that seems to be the case.
Posts: 18
Threads: 1
Joined: 2015 Jul
Thanks: 0
Given 40 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
Country:
2018-10-17, 01:38 AM
(This post was last modified: 2018-10-17, 01:52 AM by henryperu77.)
|