Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1013 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
I checked on ebay, and a tape come at about 20 to 25 buck shipped to europe.
I think I may crack and buy one, but I would need to also buy a capture card for my hackintosh to digitise it.
Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1013 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
Hey guys, so I was thinking, maybe members of this community should create a company, not to release films, but to offer sound restoration services and color timing services.
What do you guys think?
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1499 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1013 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
I mean, the only reason I think companies don't listen when called in on other forums, is that this is an individual and not a company.
If we did create one, and called on an official website other companies in, with screenshots and audio screens and such that would go viral.
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
I don't know. I'd say there's enough professionals in the industry whose skills probably far surpass ours. The reason major releases are often lacking, I think, has more to do with them simply not caring about approaching their projects from a similar perspective we do, or being explicitly paid/instructed to do it differently. Even if we made a company, who would hire us and what would set us apart aside from our philosophy? Talking about sound restoration, do we even do that? For the most part we just capture and sync tracks. Again, if that was their goal, they wouldn't need us to do it for them, because it's a relatively simple task.
However for spreading awareness I think some kind of nicely designed and organized website might serve the same purpose. But making and maintaining that would involve continuous work and hosting/domain cost and I'm not sure anyone here wants to commit to something like that.
With that said, how about expanding on this already existing website with a wiki or something like that? I know that's 3 steps down from your suggestion, but I think it's more realistic.
Just my 2 cents, maybe I'm completely wrong.
Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1013 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
A wiki is a great idea.
I'm tired of seeing people being shot down just because they are fans, by establishing a wiki where we can point out bad releases, and fixes, it might help change people's minds.
Posts: 1,641
Threads: 26
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 39
Given 204 thank(s) in 156 post(s)
Country:
2019-07-07, 07:47 PM
(This post was last modified: 2019-07-07, 07:47 PM by SilverWook.)
Posts: 612
Threads: 26
Joined: 2016 Nov
Thanks: 1
Given 410 thank(s) in 160 post(s)
(2019-06-30, 03:43 PM)TomArrow Wrote: I don't know. I'd say there's enough professionals in the industry whose skills probably far surpass ours. The reason major releases are often lacking, I think, has more to do with them simply not caring about approaching their projects from a similar perspective we do, or being explicitly paid/instructed to do it differently. Even if we made a company, who would hire us and what would set us apart aside from our philosophy? Talking about sound restoration, do we even do that? For the most part we just capture and sync tracks. Again, if that was their goal, they wouldn't need us to do it for them, because it's a relatively simple task.
However for spreading awareness I think some kind of nicely designed and organized website might serve the same purpose. But making and maintaining that would involve continuous work and hosting/domain cost and I'm not sure anyone here wants to commit to something like that.
With that said, how about expanding on this already existing website with a wiki or something like that? I know that's 3 steps down from your suggestion, but I think it's more realistic.
Just my 2 cents, maybe I'm completely wrong.
Yes, often the releases are bad due to explicit instructions from the company requesting the restoration, or time constraints that are very tight, and the copyright owner wanting it done on time, rather than done to a particular quality level.
We have had clients give 3 weeks total for a full restoration of a 2 hour movie. We have had others refuse to let us do grain management (when it was really, really required) on a *big* name movie, because it was going to take an extra two days, even when we showed them that the result was orders of magnitude better, they chose the worse version.
Forming a company from people on the forums is certainly possible. I worked for companies that started the same way, a group of friends, who wanted to work in restoration. A few tips for anyone starting out, that I have learned along the way.
1) Time is usually the enemy, rather than money
2) Miss a deadline with a big client and they will not use you again, and will probably let other companies know
3) It is a *full-time* job to get work done to suit most client schedules
4) The pay is terrible generally as it always takes more hours than you think it will when starting out
5) You will need to have some kind of demo-reel/portfolio to show potential clients.
6) You spend a lot of unpaid hours marketing, making and taking calls, meeting with clients either online or in person, packing and unpacking.
7) Budget time for ingest, backup, and generally moving files around. It takes so much longer than you would think.
8) Budget time for equipment failures, Windows being stupid, file corruptions and other problems beyond your control.
9) Be realistic with the amount of hours the job will take, and then decide if the money you are quoting for the job is worthwhile.
10) Be realistic with how much time you can really apply to this job, if you have other work, family, friends etc.
11) Any work for libraries or government entities usually requires you to jump through government approval hoops that are near impossible when starting out.
Many companies have started out as a group of friends that get together and it can be a rewarding profession. Just keep in mind that once you are a company, you have to think about tax, business registration, and the expectations of clients are that you are a *real* company, that can meet the demands of their clients.
Even if you are half the price of the competition, they won't care if you don't deliver to their expectations, especially time expectations, and when starting out you don't usually have much in the way of backup equipment, or extra people to use if things go wrong.
I'd recommend getting to know some indie film-makers who have more flexible time budgets and doing some work for them at first, where the deadlines might be more flexible, or doing some volunteer level work with an amateur film archive, like a local history society, or group that have sound or film or video in need of restoration, and get a feel for working with a client that isn't another 'enthusiast'.
Just my 2c, there are a million different ways to tackle the work and handle clients etc. If you have a passion for it, and can allocate the time and money required, you could be the next hot restoration company 
Posts: 612
Threads: 26
Joined: 2016 Nov
Thanks: 1
Given 410 thank(s) in 160 post(s)
Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1013 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
2019-07-19, 06:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 2019-07-19, 06:05 PM by Stamper.)
Does anyone living in the UK has the UK cut of Eraser (1996) ?
It looks like the UK release removed the cheesy moments in the Schwarzenegger vehicle, to make the film flow better.
It as been classified as censorship, but the actual cinema UK release was cut by about 3 seconds only.
They actually re-edited the film so that it would play better in order to make it a hit on video.
I'm very interested to see if this work better and this could be a preservation worth doing.
From the BBFC page:
The cinema release flopped in the UK so the distributor opted for a 15 release. The BBFC felt that they had removed the sadistic edge from most of the violence and revealed a good action thriller which proved to have far greater audience appeal.
-In the opening sequence where Kruger rescues Johnny C, 17s of punches were removed along with the post punch dialogue: Get me some ice, I think I broke my goddam hand.
-Also in the opening scene, a scene with a bound & gagged woman being doused with petrol has been removed. Also a thug with a petrol can saying Sure boss has been deleted.
-A close up a a man in a noose being lifted up has been cut.
-A scene where they attempt to remove Johnny's tongue was cut along with the line: See if it sings on its own
-4s cut where Kruger breaks a mans neck in a fridge door.
-1s missing of a scene which has a close up of Kruger as he pumps a second bullet into the body of the dead bad guy to frame them.
-As the hero ignites the pretrol on the floor, the sight of the flames engulfing a corpse has gone.
-3s cut in William Donough's office. He points the gun at Lee and shouts "You have no f*****g idea". In the 15 video all that remains is "You".
-In William Donough's office, 1s is cut where he puts the gun into his mouth and fires. Also, the close up of the man with blood coming out of his mouth.
-Close up of man with a blade in his neck after Kruger stabs him through the door is missing.
-We fail to see the guy he then kills flying through the air into a wall.
-In the video, we see Samaritan hold his witness and appear to smother her. It should show Samaritan shoot her and then pretend to give her mouth to mouth resuscitation as she dies.
-Samaritan actually shoots Monroe twice, one of those shots has been cut.
-Inside the alligator park, the first bad guy gets an arm ripped off.
-The hero pursues and pistol whips a SWAT man which we dont see
-The villain grabs and woman and pistol whips her, we don't see this
-Neither do we see the hero erase the swat team in a lift by removing the pins from a SWAT man's belt and then throwing him down the shaft.
|