Hello guest, if you like this forum, why don't you register? https://fanrestore.com/member.php?action=register (December 14, 2021) x


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Help] The Thing (1982) -> Best Mix?
Another big thanks from me as well for all the work you put into making this.
Reply
Thanks given by: PDB
DTS X? Nooooooo!? All jokes aside it’s nice to have all the audio for The Thing, I thought SF or Arrow would be doing their version first, but hey it’s nice to see Universal atone for the first American BD with the transfer.
Reply
Thanks given by:
Amazing work, can't wait to do some back and forths to see which version sounds best
Reply
Thanks given by: PDB
Guys, I made my homeworks, and written a long article "Disentangling “The Thing”!" talking about audio, too: http://blog.sporv.com/disentangling-the-thing/

For the lazy ones that don't want to read it all: I don't know if these info were already available here or somewhere else - my memory lacks; if not, they could be interesting...
  • According to Widescreen Review: “The original 4.0 printmaster has been remastered and coded in Dolby Digital 5.1 discrete.”
  • Shout claims “NEW 4.1 Audio Mix Created From The Original 70MM Six Track Dolby Stereo Soundtrack” - read well: “… Audio Mix Created…” – it does not mean the 4.1 IS the 70mm 6-track mix – with the obvious omission of the left center and right center “baby boom” channels mixed into the LFE… indeed, the Shout 4.1 track is – drum roll… – nothing more than a glorified 5.1 DVD version
  • as someone stated that the stereo PCM track from the Signature laserdisc is only a folddown of the Dolby Digital 5.1 included in the same disc, that are thought to be from the 70mm 6-track master, and as the upmixed PCM track shows a lot more information on the surround channels, it means that those info are included in the 5.1 track; if it’s true, it means that the Signature Dolby Digital 5.1 is the best original track available!!!

[Image: The-Thing-surround-comparison.jpg]
only for FanRes members, here you can download the surround comparison: https://fex.net/s/3fcdtnb
Go to any empty space of the 4.1 or 5.1 channel and crack up the volume; you will hear the corresponding dialogue found on DPL'ed 2.0 track, but at a very faint volume - WARNING! Remember to take down volume before switching to "full" parts!!!
Reply
Thanks given by: stwd4nder2 , SwatDB , Hitcher , Scavenger
Great write-up! Real shame about the 4.1, I always thought it was a direct port of the 70mm mix. Looking forward to checking out how the LD sounds.
Reply
Thanks given by:
Would be great to have the Signature laserdisc AC-3 track!!!
Reply
Thanks given by:
Nice write-up. So does someone have the Signature Dolby Digital 5.1 track on here then?
Reply
Thanks given by:
Quote:Turbine version used the Arrow master “fixing” a gamma error – that was limited to one frame AFAIK – and also audio tracks sync issues.
It's a lot more than just one frame. Check 01:36:25.822 - 01:36:39.961 on Arrow BD.

The opening titles apparently also have a gamma correction, but I have not compared that scene.
Reply
Thanks given by:
Had a listen through a lot of the tracks last night, have to say I prefer the WS LD (with Superstition obviously!) over all the others I checked. I’m no expert but just seemed a lot more natural - the 4.1 mixes sound a bit forced/hollow to me
Reply
Thanks given by:
(2021-09-25, 10:41 AM)Scavenger Wrote: It's a lot more than just one frame. Check 01:36:25.822 - 01:36:39.961 on Arrow BD.

The opening titles apparently also have a gamma correction, but I have not compared that scene.

Corrected, thanks!
Reply
Thanks given by:


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Request] Blade Runner: Archival Versions (1982-1992) LD tracks synced to BD Hydra Spectre 0 580 2023-06-17, 05:43 AM
Last Post: Hydra Spectre
  The Dark Crystal (1982) - LD PCM bendermac 9 4,945 2021-10-24, 01:43 PM
Last Post: Johnny-5
  Poltergeist (1982) - Uncompressed Trailer Audio Croweyes1121 0 1,413 2020-11-21, 06:34 PM
Last Post: Croweyes1121

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)