2017-11-15, 10:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-11-15, 10:06 AM by captainsolo.)
The theatrical cut bd was a new scan and it is a problematic mess of both good and bad shots. Then you have the inaccurate color timing.
The new WAC tv extended version is better somewhat but also has issues in color and bitrate due to the longer length.
The special edition cut is preferable in many ways but it is an older scan with its own innacuraccies and features many small differences.
I indeed still swear by the LD audio. The 35mm Dolby stereo I experienced was flat and dull like the 2.0 on the BD. They seemed to be identical in terms of sound. In the theater despite running properly decoded on Dolby A type stereo for matrixed surround it practically plays mono with only a few odd effects and music getting pulled out: The LD is both fuller and has some actual surround activity in comparison. It's by no means perfect but still sounds better than all the others. It's better for that opening transition alone which is IMO one of the finest opening credits ever.
The new WAC tv extended version is better somewhat but also has issues in color and bitrate due to the longer length.
The special edition cut is preferable in many ways but it is an older scan with its own innacuraccies and features many small differences.
I indeed still swear by the LD audio. The 35mm Dolby stereo I experienced was flat and dull like the 2.0 on the BD. They seemed to be identical in terms of sound. In the theater despite running properly decoded on Dolby A type stereo for matrixed surround it practically plays mono with only a few odd effects and music getting pulled out: The LD is both fuller and has some actual surround activity in comparison. It's by no means perfect but still sounds better than all the others. It's better for that opening transition alone which is IMO one of the finest opening credits ever.
Damn Fool Idealistic Crusader