Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
(2015-05-27, 07:13 PM)X5gb Wrote: surely you could release a two Bluray set. One with this feature which sounds cool along with been able to use it as an open matte and second disc as plain OAR.
That's another option I thought... but you must admit that the hard/soft matte feature is really interesting!
Posts: 863
Threads: 5
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 186
Given 212 thank(s) in 145 post(s)
Country:
(2015-05-27, 07:30 PM)spoRv Wrote: (2015-05-27, 07:13 PM)X5gb Wrote: surely you could release a two Bluray set. One with this feature which sounds cool along with been able to use it as an open matte and second disc as plain OAR.
That's another option I thought... but you must admit that the hard/soft matte feature is really interesting!
It's a very cool feature. I have just managed to watch your test clip on my htpc using VLC. It's looking good but I assume because this is just a test it is not spot on at the join. I noticed in the bottom left corner you can see the line splice between both 1.85:1 Wowow and Canal+. I take it both still need to be properly matched upto each other in colour, brightness etc, or is that not the case.
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
Yes, it's a quick-n-dirt test, just to give the ideas that is possible to use Canal+ for the top and bottom slices, and to show the hard matte technique.
Of course, if after further testings the quality will not arise, it will always be possible to do as you suggested; an open matte version - with hard matte option - using Canal+ (delogo) and another 1.85:1 using WOWOW; third option, one version with two video streams!
Posts: 863
Threads: 5
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 186
Given 212 thank(s) in 145 post(s)
Country:
2015-05-27, 08:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 2015-05-27, 08:54 PM by X5gb.)
(2015-05-27, 08:23 PM)spoRv Wrote: Yes, it's a quick-n-dirt test, just to give the ideas that is possible to use Canal+ for the top and bottom slices, and to show the hard matte technique.
Of course, if after further testings the quality will not arise, it will always be possible to do as you suggested; an open matte version - with hard matte option - using Canal+ (delogo) and another 1.85:1 using WOWOW; third option, one version with two video streams! As you confirmed, it's just a quick-n-dirt test, so I'm sure it will look a lot better when done properly.
I personally think both versions should use the Wowow anyway so hope you can get it right.
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
This project is not forgotten!
But, because, celebrating the new Jurassic World, one of our Italian channels decided to broadcast all the three (at this point) prequels, in HD, I've decided to grab them, to see if they have "something more" than BD - hardly, I think, but it *may* happen!
Posts: 3,292
Threads: 176
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1451
Given 977 thank(s) in 494 post(s)
Country:
Here's hoping 2 and 3 look better then the BD.
Film Addict
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
Recording another movie, I noted the spot for JP 1+2+3 was there... don't expect high quality - bitrate is around 5/6mbps - but as you could notice, color grading is different... dunno if it's *right*, or more right than the WOWOW (which is pretty close to SKY and 2D BD)... well, here you are comparisons for five frames:
http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/129875
Posts: 3,292
Threads: 176
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1451
Given 977 thank(s) in 494 post(s)
Country:
Yeah that's not that good, seems to bright as well. Is there even a WOWOW of 2 and 3?
Film Addict
Posts: 863
Threads: 5
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 186
Given 212 thank(s) in 145 post(s)
Country:
2015-06-04, 09:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 2015-06-04, 10:09 AM by X5gb.)
(2015-06-04, 05:24 AM)DoomBot Wrote: Yeah that's not that good, seems to bright as well. Is there even a WOWOW of 2 and 3? There is a Wowow of 2 (one with subs throughout and one with only headers) and 3 (one with subs, which there is a version which has been overlayed, and one with only the headers) but from what I remember the Blurays have both beat especially 2. There is also a Canal+ and Sky of 2 and a Sky of 3, again the Bluray,s have them beat in every area from what I remember. It is only 1 with its overuse of EE, zoomboxed and different color-timing that lets the trilogy Blurays down.
Sorry to say it spoRv, but the Italian print of 1 is not good, way too bright and washed out along with the big logo.
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
Yep, I noted the quality is pretty bad... but brightness could be lowered, and then *maybe* color grading *could* be useful... the more (sources) the better!
|