Hello guest, if you like this forum, why don't you register? https://fanrestore.com/member.php?action=register (December 14, 2021) x


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is the LotR 4K remaster a failure?
#41
(2020-12-24, 05:00 AM)pipefan413 Wrote:
(2020-12-24, 04:58 AM)Eggman Wrote: So that's why so many of my old DVDs, like Harry Potter, lean towards magenta! It's kind of charming; its the sepia tone of the 21st century. It's definitely preferable to the awful teal wash that plagues every other transfer these days. Any idea as to why IPs have that effect?

Have a look at PDB's thread about "Project CRT"... I don't think it has anything to do with the IPs but rather the fact they were graded on (and for) CRTs. I could be mistaken, of course, but I don't think so.

Hey thanks for the recommendation! I have a Sony PVM myself and I'll have to compare how they look on the CRT vs my LCD. I just so happen to have all the Harry Potters on DVD some in fullscreen so that's even more fitting. More on topic I'm not sure how to feel about the LOTR remasters however I am curious if the 2021 release of the 4K UHDs will include some more of those previously unseen and unreleased deleted scenes.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#42
Some color differences in The Two Towers

New Master Theatrical Cut /Old Master Theatrical Cut
[Image: TcsgOhh.jpg]
Reply
#43
Such a major leap is color.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#44
I've just come away from viewing The Two Towers UHD (Theatrical). I can honestly say that I've never enjoyed watching this film so much. The new colour grade is transformative. Shots that were previously flat and lifeless under blanket digital tints now have beautiful depth and vivid colour particularly the landscapes. I noticed details that were never apparent to me before such as the scattered purple flowers on the clifftop as Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli are running and the gold detailing on Gimli's armour and around the entrance to Meduseld. The HDR is a massive plus on the brightness side as well. The sunlight reflecting off the backs of the Rohirrim as they ride down to Helm's Deep was a jaw-dropper for me.

I have to say that I sit a good 10ft away from a 55" screen and my eyes are 41 years old so the DNR and occasional smudgy shot was never noticeable enough to take me out of the movie.

So are these remasters a failure? A waste of money? Absolutely not. Can't wait to see what they've done with Return Of The King.
Reply
Thanks given by: jonno
#45
So the Theatrical and Extended cuts have two entirely separate masters in terms of colour?
Reply
Thanks given by:
#46
As far as I know they are the same.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#47
I was going to wait until finishing the trilogy before trying to form an opinion but, having seen the first two (theatrical), I too have come firmly down on the positive side.

I'm very much a film guy and generally very suspicious of attempts to digitally sanitise analogue sources. Comments here and elsewhere had left me without much hope that this release would be for me. But the approach taken here has given a picture which, projected on a 7ft screen, is as detailed and immersive as I've seen since the original releases - most likely more so.

Yes, there are a scattering of excessively-smoothed shots, which could charitably be viewed as a best effort to reconcile some frustratingly rough sources (though there is every chance that they're simply victims of a too-tight release schedule), but they're hardly enough to destroy the experience. If this release doesn't work for others, that's fair enough, but I'd encourage anyone who hasn't actually watched them to do so - the screenshots don't seem to be doing the actual viewing experience justice.
Reply
Thanks given by: allldu , Bigrob
#48
In regards to the OP post : I would say the BluRay version can't really hold up a candle in terms of color accuracy and that's what matters most from a calibration perspective (aka how the director intended for the viewer to see). The HDR part is bonus & welcome, of course.

What i'm curious is - the LFE level didn't seem loud when I've watched it, actually quite spot-on.
What audio setup are you using @TomArrow ?
Multimedia / HiFi / UHD / BR FanBoy
ISF Calibrated Sony X900F + HTPC
B&W 5.1 audio setup 
Reply
Thanks given by:
#49
I got done watched the discs myself recently. DNR definitely seemed prominent with 2K upscale levels of detail in certain shots, while some shots looked fairly grainy and pleasing. I think I noticed the DNR the most in ROTK.

I hope that someday a fan restoration can be cobbled together from different sources and make an ultimate version that exceeds this release. Unfortunately I'm not nearly experienced enough to do something like that myself.
Reply
Thanks given by:
#50
@webbos I'll give you that, something about my audio setup may be wonky. It's not professionally set up or calibrated or anything, just random 5.1 components thrown together lol.
Reply
Thanks given by: webbos


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Matrix 1999 (IMAX Remaster) Endocryne 5 2,751 2021-12-09, 09:14 AM
Last Post: dvdmike
  Silence of the Lambs gets a 4K Remaster by Criterion deleted user 79 55,536 2021-10-02, 06:13 PM
Last Post: thekenta
  Murder on the Orient Express 1974 "Classics Remastered" - is it an actual remaster? deleted user 11 11,016 2017-12-15, 08:17 AM
Last Post: SpaceBlackKnight

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)