Posts: 2,049
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 161
Given 1008 thank(s) in 612 post(s)
Harris has been this way for a long long time. Bram Stoker's Dracula was the real eye-opener for a lot of people.
Posts: 5,026
Threads: 174
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3156
Given 2925 thank(s) in 1283 post(s)
Country:
Agreed, I use to really respect Harris but he has defended some objectively, bad work in the past and seems to be doing so again. I hope his defense is for political reasons and not that he is losing his competency.
The simple matter is these were almost all 1080p masters upscaled with DNR to 2160p in the worse way possible. We, in fact, have know TL was an upscale of the old 1080p for well over a year before its release based off the Hulu master.
I had a lot of downtime to peruse youtube lately and watched a lot of reviews. The defenses of these discs came off like a parody of the 7 Stages of Grief. I actually grew tired of the excuses placing the blame on S35, film stock, bad OCNs or bad lenses. You can only sell that to the uninformed. Or even worse, the excuse, "that's what Cameron wants". Also if your expertise is reviewing video media, then using the phrase "you need to lighten up about 4K releases" is antithetical to your existence as a reviewer.
Those of you that have been here long enough know I love Cameron's movies. Love them. What we got was a result of laziness. Pure and simple. Cameron was lazy, which is a thing I'd thought I'd never say. There is no technical reasons they couldn't of done a fresh 4K scan of all the OCNs or even the IPs. There is no way the TL OCN is that bad and if it is, a 4K scan of one of the IPs would be miles ahead of what we got.
It is a bad product. Pure and simple.
Posts: 2,519
Threads: 40
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2019
Given 434 thank(s) in 358 post(s)
Country:
Said for decades, he knows photochemical not digital and less and less filmic looks
Posts: 2,693
Threads: 47
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1637
Given 954 thank(s) in 608 post(s)
You need to lighten up about 4K releases.