Posts: 2,541
Threads: 43
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2033
Given 442 thank(s) in 363 post(s)
Country:
Weird, this one is so crazy for what was once the biggest budget movie of all time!
(Worse as tech wise leaning on digital domain after T2 it went so far forward and a million times back)
Posts: 2,712
Threads: 48
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1647
Given 963 thank(s) in 613 post(s)
I know it's incorrect (the 35mm scan) because most scans I think done by the same team have also incorrect levels of about everything.
Also I happen to have seen this one I think about a dozen times in cinemas so I know a bit how it looked.
It's obvious though even for someone unfamiliar with the film, that the many levels are completely incorrect with their scan.
Not to be too harsh, as it's better than nothing, but other scanners have given us a habit of way more transparent and professional work, even from faded prints.
Posts: 432
Threads: 27
Joined: 2015 May
Thanks: 61
Given 82 thank(s) in 68 post(s)
Country:
I have a PAL to NTSC DVD I made years ago because it was DVD9 and anamorphic... and the colors are definitely seriously blue.
Posts: 16
Threads: 3
Joined: 2020 Dec
Thanks: 47
Given 1 thank(s) in 1 post(s)
Country:
true lies It was my first movie seen in the cinema
Posts: 2,541
Threads: 43
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2033
Given 442 thank(s) in 363 post(s)
Country:
Do you have a comparison?