Posts: 3,287
Threads: 176
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1437
Given 974 thank(s) in 491 post(s)
Country:
I stand corrected, damn i thought BT had more for some reason. That's a really big difference!
Film Addict
Posts: 3,287
Threads: 176
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1437
Given 974 thank(s) in 491 post(s)
Country:
How about the hdclub? 158,306 users
Film Addict
Posts: 2,290
Threads: 39
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 177
Given 187 thank(s) in 133 post(s)
I am not a member there so that's out for me, but thanx for the suggestion.
Here, I'm conflicted a little bit... Feallan mentioned that BT is good enough and I can see his point, if my release is directed at the community only, but I wanted this release to be as available as possible.
The way I look at it is this:
a) lots of people own the atrocious BD release (so the big-D got their money on an "HD" quality format)
b) I am NOT selling this (and neither should ANYBODY ELSE!)
c) this release is made available from a broadcast source (personal recordings, "not for profit," are allowed to be possessed by anyone, otherwise how would VCRs, burnable DVDs/BDs, and DVR be possible?)
d) this is a preservation of the original, unaltered version of the film which has a historical/archival significance.
Posts: 3,287
Threads: 176
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1437
Given 974 thank(s) in 491 post(s)
Country:
It's easy sign up and i think your guaranteed to get in. Probably why they have so many members.
Film Addict
Posts: 22
Threads: 4
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 0
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Country:
Forgive me for asking, but what do you mean when you say BT?
Posts: 459
Threads: 35
Joined: 2015 Oct
Thanks: 1
Given 22 thank(s) in 19 post(s)
Country:
Aw man, I missed it!? Shame!