2016-02-18, 01:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 2016-02-18, 01:17 AM by jerryshadoe.)
(2016-02-17, 03:09 AM)marin888 Wrote: ...On his PC record have normal look, on my like old DVD, which for me was unacceptable that is HD. And he continues "saying" it's normal.
WTF Why he lying, why he don't want accept and say that is lowest HD record ever.hock:
...
...After he makes samples it was really WTF, he use damn incorrect player, and all discussion was on damn wrong screenshots. What a mess.
Then I make proper comparison with VLC player for the end. All my intention was to show what it is. And unfortunately he can't make proper record....
CALLING SOMEONE A LIAR, LIKE YOU DID IN THIS POST IS BASHING THEM!!!!
Especially with your tone about "damn" this and "damn" that and you keep on claiming that he doesn't know what he's doing when he is capturing this. (Do I really need to quote you, with links, to your posts over on OT???)
(2016-02-17, 01:39 PM)marin888 Wrote: You guys got me totally wrong.
I don't bashing no one! I never say that he did is just f***ing stupid!
He can't capture it as full HD because he reciving re-encoded signal.
Did I say something wrong?
Well, I just explained how you are bashing him, so YES, you did say something wrong.
YOU are RIGHT about the fact that you never said "....f***ing stupid!"
I DID!!! To make this clear, I think it's f***ing stupid that YOU said that it looks like his 1080i capture is "Heavily DNR'ed" because this just proves that you have no idea what you are talking about. You are confusing terms. Digital Noise Reduction is a filter that can be applied to any video, and yes the result can end up looking like a slightly out-of-focus image OR a smeared image OR slightly blurry (all of this depends on how much the filter is used, but this is NOT done during captures like this and is a POST-production thing done by STUDIOS and not people in THIS community that are all about preserving the highest, rawest, most UN-tampered, best quality video AND audio. WHAT YOU ACTUALLY SEE HERE IS COMPRESSION ARTIFACTS CAUSED BY THE CABLE COMPANIES RE-ENCODING THEIR STREAMS USING EXTREMELY LOW BITRATES (I have seen as low as 4000kbps on some 1080i streams for the video and 5.1 384kbps AC3 audio) This is NOT DNR, but low bitrate "damage" due to the extreme COMPRESSION that is occurring. PLEASE EDUCATE YOURSELF BEFORE you make such comments.
THANK YOU for FINALLY acknowledging that he is receiving a re-encoded stream
(2016-02-17, 01:55 PM)marin888 Wrote: I only try to help and expect that someone will send to him full HD record.
This is my second firing squad on me because of my bad English.
If you are really trying to help, you could be NICER instead of bashing people
How can you "expect" anything?
Hope?
Wish?
Predict?
Suppose?
Those, maybe, might be more appropriate choice there.
OR, even better, if you were trying to help, YOU could send it to him
uperman: PLEASE DO NOT USE BAD ENGLISH AS AN EXCUSE!!!
The are NUMEROUS members HERE that are from ALL over the WORLD and English is NOT their native language and we ALL manage to communicate with each other respectfully, even when there are disagreements or when there is misunderstandings because of bad English. It's ALL about YOUR attitude, sir.
Now, we are also forgiving (well, some of us) and IF you change your attitude, listen, learn, then we can move forward without ANY problems
NOW, BACK to the ORIGINAL POST made by YOU:
Assuming that the LD audio could be synced relatively easily, would there be any benefit or is the audio available now decent enough? Does anyone here have this?
