Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1481 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country: 
Some days ago I noted that the grain applied to the last encoded video was a bit too evident, so I thought to use a lower setting; plus, I used a deblock and a light dropout removal filter; I think now it's better than before, but, as I'm still using this little monitor, I'd like to receive some feedbacks from someone with big screens, before going on...
old settings: https://www.sendspace.com/file/er22ly
new settings: https://www.sendspace.com/file/wpsxg1
what do you think?
Posts: 1,155
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 756
Given 346 thank(s) in 226 post(s)
The new settings look great.
Looking forward to this.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1481 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Thanks for your feedback!!! Happy to know someone else likes my new settings! 
Posts: 3,302
Threads: 176
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1523
Given 986 thank(s) in 501 post(s)
Country: 
Personally i didn't think the grain was to much on the first settings but maybe boost it one notch on the new. You may want to wait for your new monitor before finalizing and see it for your self.
Film Addict
Posts: 2,289
Threads: 39
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 177
Given 190 thank(s) in 134 post(s)
2015-02-12, 08:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 2015-02-12, 08:54 PM by jerryshadoe.)
Andrea, I agree with Doombot that you might want to wait until you have a new monitor as the "old" settings file (the one with more grain) looks fine. Granted, some people might disagree, but I think the "new" settings do not have enough grain to the point where it looked to me like it had almost no grain. Ultimately the decision is yours, but you should have the proper equipment in order to make a correct assessment
Posts: 19
Threads: 0
Joined: 2015 Feb
Thanks: 13
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
2015-02-13, 05:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 2015-02-13, 05:28 PM by thegroovologist.)
I agree with Doombot and jerryshadoe.
I don't think there was too much grain in the first (final) version. I don't like the new version to be honest...it looks like there is hardly any grain left.
My vote goes to the original (final) version. Or maybe a tiny bit less grain...but only a tiny bit.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1481 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
In old setting, grain was 25%, while in the new one was 10%...
What should I try now? Let's say 18% could do? I'm going to encode it at 18%, then I'll post a link to it here.
Posts: 19
Threads: 0
Joined: 2015 Feb
Thanks: 13
Given 0 thank(s) in 0 post(s)
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1481 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 5,095
Threads: 178
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3338
Given 3106 thank(s) in 1331 post(s)
Country:
|
