Posts: 2,693
Threads: 47
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1637
Given 954 thank(s) in 608 post(s)
2017-12-10, 04:50 PM
(This post was last modified: 2017-12-10, 04:55 PM by Stamper.)
It could be the print was post 2004 and made from the retimed scan. Remember the old (initial DVD/initial look 35mm) was only available for like 4/5 years before they did the new timing to go along with the sequels.
Back in 2003/2004 they were still making prints, so it could be they stuck prints from the new scan for Matrix nights and other showings and this is one such print that ended up at the Cinematheque.
I suppose when offered, the Cinematheque was happy to archive a brand new print instead of a battered one from 5 years before.
Posts: 1,255
Threads: 14
Joined: 2017 Aug
Thanks: 100
Given 306 thank(s) in 226 post(s)
Country:
2017-12-10, 05:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 2017-12-10, 05:19 PM by Beber.)
Stamper : Remember the old (initial DVD/initial look 35mm) was only available for like 4/5 years before they did the new timing to go along with the sequels.
That's the assumption I'm no longer on board with. And obviously, the 35mm scan available and the initial DVD are totally different with each other.
You really think that Warner Bros. department in France put money into a set of new prints that went all the way through the lab process to add the dub and/or laser engraved French subtitles to it for a non-rerelease?
Posts: 2,049
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 161
Given 1008 thank(s) in 612 post(s)
Are we expecting the UHD to be any different to the blu? We might get fewer compression artifacts if we're lucky, I can't say I expect anything else
Posts: 2,693
Threads: 47
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1637
Given 954 thank(s) in 608 post(s)
2017-12-10, 07:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 2017-12-10, 07:41 PM by Stamper.)
Are we sure there were no re-releases? I think with the advent of the sequels, they may have stuck new prints for Matrix nights or such.
Or would that mean the 35mm grindhouse scan is wrong? Thats certainly interesting.
Posts: 2,693
Threads: 47
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1637
Given 954 thank(s) in 608 post(s)
2017-12-10, 10:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 2017-12-10, 10:51 PM by Stamper.)
Even just HDR is justification enough to revisit a film, it doesn't matter if it was only 35mm with 2K VFX. Nuke can upscale this effortlessly (they upscaled SKYFALL using that software and also Fury Road I think). It's not all about resolution. The interest is really the expanded color palette.
So I would say a fix of the Blu-ray would be the better option now, removing the green and adding the cinema sound.
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
I've always been suspicious about the 35mm fanres colors, given the already stated fact that they were regraded twice. They also don't quite look right to me.