Posts: 145
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Mar
Thanks: 51
Given 103 thank(s) in 48 post(s)
Yep, all of the them expect for VI. (Which Chewtobacca already made a good version of.) For some of them (definitely the motion picture) the container specifies they are in PC colorspace, while they are really at TV levels. You have to specify that when you work with them. The ffmpeg command -vf "scale=in_range=tv" worked for that with TMP.
Posts: 661
Threads: 27
Joined: 2016 Feb
Thanks: 173
Given 234 thank(s) in 166 post(s)
Country:
I was thinking today if when this originally came out on DVD, if a 35mm print was struck for special cinema screenings. Or did it just go straight to DVD
Posts: 145
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Mar
Thanks: 51
Given 103 thank(s) in 48 post(s)
2018-02-24, 09:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 2018-02-24, 10:10 PM by iguanaclerk.)
The director's cut went straight to DVD, and was edited in SD. (including interlaced material with a hard pulldown and some effects that run at 30 fps) They apparently did a screening for the premire, but it still would have been in SD, projected digitaly.
Posts: 5,030
Threads: 175
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3177
Given 2942 thank(s) in 1285 post(s)
Country:
Thanks iguanaclerk. The original was pretty great and this is an improvement over the original. Just skimmed through and I'm excited to watch.
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
Just curious, are you combining both PAL and NTSC DVD of the Director's Cut to improve picture quality? spoRv called the idea "PaNup" I think
https://fanrestore.com/thread-25.html
Posts: 145
Threads: 12
Joined: 2015 Mar
Thanks: 51
Given 103 thank(s) in 48 post(s)
The DC cut was done on a NSTC master, and upcaled for the PAL release. All the PAL discs supposedly look very bad. They also probably have framerate issues in the sections of the DC cut that run at 30 fps interlaced.