Posts: 1,202
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 823
Given 371 thank(s) in 240 post(s)
2018-04-16, 03:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 2018-04-16, 03:52 PM by CSchmidlapp.)
Posts: 5,153
Threads: 182
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3569
Given 3250 thank(s) in 1367 post(s)
Country:
There are some software methods to do that, you might want to read up on hairy_hen's postings on the OT. He used software decoding with SW's LD's PCM 2.0 to get "discrete" channels in his first 70mm re-creation.
Strangely enough most people including myself, swear more by hardware methods, which it what I did on my Back to the Future upscale and what TomArrow does.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
I use FooBar2000 for this type of conversions.
FreeSurround seems very good; there is also a Dolby Pro Logic II decoder - can't say if it's better, but it does not produce a LFE channel; you could test both and, in the case DPLII decoder is better, you could always extract basses to feed LFE from front channels, or remux the LFE produced by FreeSurround.
Can't say if software is better than hardware; in theory, using the same technique used by any modern hardware decoder, it *should* sound the same. The fact old hardware processors with analog circuitry sound better could be very true.
Sure, software is so easy - drag the file, press convert, wait few seconds (minutes), and it's done... with hardware, you should plug the cables, play the file/physical format, record the 4.0/5.1 output, and it's done in real time (converting a 2 hours movie will take 2 hours...) - but result could be rewarding, I guess - PDB and TomArrow could witness this, I believe.
Posts: 5,153
Threads: 182
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3569
Given 3250 thank(s) in 1367 post(s)
Country:
Like Sporv said: try foobar and it's ATSurround or FreeSurround pack first. It is a cheap place to start.
But perhaps a hardware vs software test is needed.
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
I have the Dolby SDU4 hardware decoder here. This is the older official decoder for studio monitoring use. Can offer you its 4.0 outputs if you like.
Edit: As for software, I only know of freesurround that spoRv mentioned and Minnetonka's SurCode for Dolby Pro Logic II (which seems to be using an "official" software implementation), but they both don't give you the exact output you would get from the proper hardware decoder. For example, they ignore the frequency lowpass on the rear channel, as it was used in those older mixes. They also ignore the rear channel delay afaik.
Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1880
Given 1012 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
Tom, is there a way also to properly re-encode actual 5.1 into DS with hardware, to obtain a perfect stereo/DS version? I'm interested in this.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
Stamper, yes. The Dolby SEU4 is the corresponding hardware encoder to the SDU4 decoder. I don't have it though. And as spoRv says, it only has 4-channel input. If you want 5.1 with discrete channels, you probably have to use the newer versions like Dolby Pro Logic II, which are more advanced and probably can also just as well be done with software (with the Surcode one). Dolby claims they are all compatible, but I am not sure to what extent that is true (not because I doubt it, but because I lack the technical knowledge to understand it).
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 1,202
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 823
Given 371 thank(s) in 240 post(s)
2018-04-17, 11:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 2018-04-17, 11:32 AM by CSchmidlapp.)
|