2019-02-12, 02:06 AM
Interesting, so I guess they upgraded it from 1440x1080 to 1920x1080 in the R-version. My bad for assuming that stayed the same.
Fanrestore - Fan Restoration Forum
›
General discussions
›
Official and unofficial releases
[versions] Star Wars saga in UHD
[versions] Star Wars saga in UHD
|
[versions] Star Wars saga in UHD
|
Posts: 501
Threads: 13 Joined: 2015 Mar Thanks: 47
Given 77 thank(s) in 40 post(s) Country: 
2019-02-13, 12:36 AM
I wouldn't call that an upgrade. 1440x1080 and 1920x1080 are the same thing. The first one just being the anamorphic version.
2019-02-13, 12:53 AM
(2019-02-13, 12:36 AM)ilovewaterslides Wrote: I wouldn't call that an upgrade. 1440x1080 and 1920x1080 are the same thing. The first one just being the anamorphic version. Well, yeah, but when we're talking about the footage being suited for a reasonable big 2K master, then it kind of makes a little bit of a difference I guess, in terms of horizontal resolution. But of course the other factor is the resolution of the 3D renders & stock footage too. 
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601 Joined: 2015 Jan Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s) Country: 
2019-02-13, 01:33 AM
Posts: 501
Threads: 13 Joined: 2015 Mar Thanks: 47
Given 77 thank(s) in 40 post(s) Country:
2019-02-13, 01:50 AM
I call it anamorphic
 1440x1080: 1920x1080:
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601 Joined: 2015 Jan Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s) Country:
2019-02-13, 02:00 AM
2019-02-13, 03:00 AM
You can call it anamorphic and you aren't wrong, but you still get less horizontal resolution. Also, the resampling from 1440x1080 to 1920x1080 likely also has a slight sharpness toll in itself, as you can for example similarly notice when you take a sharp image and resample it only by 1 pixel, there's still some loss.
This may be a smaller problem with anamorphic *film*, as it doesn't strictly speaking have a fixed resolution. Not saying it's unacceptable, but hey.
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601 Joined: 2015 Jan Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s) Country:
2019-02-17, 03:10 PM
Waiting for EP1 4K (or higher) scan, I've found a so-called UHDrip... it seems a (very simple) upscale from BD, where any hardware upscaler could eventually do better... so, I can't resist the challenge, and did my own "version" - thrown there also a custom regrade, just for the sake of it!
 http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/130289 Also, gave a try to EP2 - HDTV bilinear Vs mine: http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/130317 Problem #1: do you see a lot of difference viewing it 1x? I do see, but maybe because I have the restoration fever, or very picky... Problem #2: it will take A LOT to do that for a whole movie... first takes around two minutes, while second four minutes, for EACH FRAME!  - so, 8 months and half up to 17 months to make a SINGLE MOVIE! 
2019-02-17, 04:30 PM
(2019-02-17, 03:10 PM)spoRv Wrote: Waiting for EP1 4K (or higher) scan, I've found a so-called UHDrip... it seems a (very simple) upscale from BD, where any hardware upscaler could eventually do better... so, I can't resist the challenge, and did my own "version" - thrown there also a custom regrade, just for the sake of it! Gigapixel? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)