Posts: 1,539
Threads: 60
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 229
Given 632 thank(s) in 372 post(s)
Country:
2019-04-10, 11:45 AM
(This post was last modified: 2019-04-11, 11:58 PM by Chewtobacca.)
Posts: 459
Threads: 29
Joined: 2015 May
Thanks: 69
Given 85 thank(s) in 71 post(s)
Country:
I wondered if anyone would do this. Thanks!
Posts: 1,539
Threads: 60
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 229
Given 632 thank(s) in 372 post(s)
Country:
2019-04-11, 11:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 2019-04-11, 11:57 PM by Chewtobacca.)
^ You're welcome.
I updated the OP because I forgot to credit PDB and althor. Sorry, guys!
Posts: 459
Threads: 29
Joined: 2015 May
Thanks: 69
Given 85 thank(s) in 71 post(s)
Country:
2019-04-12, 05:24 AM
(This post was last modified: 2019-04-12, 05:25 AM by Doctor M.)
Was there really enough recoverable information to go to 720p? Didn't the laserdisc have only about 320 lines?
I didn't see screenshots on MySpleen.
Posts: 1,539
Threads: 60
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 229
Given 632 thank(s) in 372 post(s)
Country:
There was a whole range of reasons why I chose to go to 720p. I like releases to be in a form that people can burn to disc "as is" if they want to, and I wanted to keep the audio PCM for purists. My first thought was to make two DVD-9s, but many people still don't like burning them, and others would want the whole thing on one disc. It's possible to encode 480p for BD, but only with a soft 2:3 pulldown and the fake-interlaced switch set, and free muxers tend not to like such streams, so you have to monkey around with disabling b-frames; besides, my experience is that players often have issues with such discs no matter what you do in terms of settings. Therefore, I upscaled to 720p. The result is not that big, fits on one disc despite running well over three hours, and retains the PCM.
Posts: 459
Threads: 29
Joined: 2015 May
Thanks: 69
Given 85 thank(s) in 71 post(s)
Country:
2019-04-13, 03:10 AM
(This post was last modified: 2019-04-13, 03:11 AM by Doctor M.)
You could just as well have gone with 480p and mastered it as a BD with the PCM track.
With a really high bitrate you'd still use more than half a BD25 easily.
To go to 720p you'd need a really serious upscaler like DarkJedi was using to make the 720p SW releases from the GOUT discs.
(To be clear, none of this is a complaint. I'm good with this as-is, I'm just thinking from technical what-ifs.)
Posts: 1,539
Threads: 60
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 229
Given 632 thank(s) in 372 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 459
Threads: 29
Joined: 2015 May
Thanks: 69
Given 85 thank(s) in 71 post(s)
Country:
Oops, read about the 480p limitation and then immediately forgot I read it.
I never heard about the soft 2:3 pulldown limitation on BD. Is that for mpeg2 and X264?
Posts: 1,539
Threads: 60
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 229
Given 632 thank(s) in 372 post(s)
Country:
For BD, 720*480 primary streams need to be 29.97i, either hard telecined or 23.976fps+2:3-pulldown flags. That's true of h.264 or MPEG-2. Even if you follow the stringent requirements for h.264 to the letter and your muxer accepts the input, many players simply don't like the resulting disc and refuse to play it. I tried every combination of settings years ago, and none would result in a disc that played reliably across a range of makes and models.
In my experience, BD players are more tolerant of abnormalities in MPEG-2 streams than h.264 streams, so an out-of-spec 480p stream without pulldown flags would be more likely to play, especially if you flagged the stream properly, which few people do. But I wasn't about to use MPEG-2: someone would only recompress the disc for the sake of it, probably neglecting to remove the pulldown in the process and creating complaints about "interlacing".
Posts: 114
Threads: 10
Joined: 2018 Jun
Thanks: 41
Given 24 thank(s) in 18 post(s)
Country:
2019-04-15, 09:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 2019-04-15, 09:56 PM by DeafYakuza.)
|