Posts: 2,810
Threads: 50
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1882
Given 1012 thank(s) in 650 post(s)
2018-01-17, 04:22 AM
(This post was last modified: 2018-01-17, 04:23 AM by Stamper.)
I like it. Did you contemplate ditching the sides to get an IMAX version with the most shot image, but without the black angles?
That would mean 1.44 or 1.66 logo free? Watching the test clip, I find the changing angles bothering a bit.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Getting rid of the angles would lead back to one of the sources, so it would be pointless. I'm aware that changing angles is bothering, but the alternative is to use "ambilight" (which I don't like) or inpainting (which is unfeasible with such big area). So, angles or not angles, this is the problem!
As written before, the composited image of the old grading (DVD+HDTV+ATV) is bigger than the new grading (BD+WEB+SDTV) as you can see in the next images:
I like to get more image (and less black angles) but, even if a fullscreen DVD exists, that would replace ATV to get much better quality and color uniformity, the resolution would always be inferior to new grading, and I think contrast, too - yes, I know BD (WEB/SDTV) has clipping whites, but the contrast is much closer than DVD (HDTV/ATV).
So, unless some revolution (pun intended), the triple sources AAP-AR would use BD, WEB, SDTV; color grading would NOT be changed, to be in line with Reloaded and Revolutions.
Now I've found a way to get the image touches the borders, losing maybe 1% "slices" in few occasions - a small price to pay IMHO, at least unless a future autoalign script update would include this possibility.
There is still some minor alignment errors sometimes (admittedly, they seems very few), like in the following frame:
that would be simply solved using only dual source (losing a very small portion of top and/or bottom SDTV "slices"):
SDTV logo: unless a new source with the same grading and comparable quality (and eventual logo in a different place) would be found, there are some instances where logo is still noticeable
the solution, as suggested before, could be to remove completely the top part of the image, but it will cut a lot of good image, too... so, I thought just to cut the top left corner which has the logo, to preserve the rest of the top part on the right of it:
yes, I know, a further black angle... still, a lot more image than cutting all top part!!!
deleted user
Unregistered
Thanks:
Given thank(s) in post(s)
I approve of this tinkering.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 1,202
Threads: 28
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 823
Given 371 thank(s) in 240 post(s)
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Bad news: I made a mistake, so I preferred to wipe out the encoded pass 2 so far...
Good news: correcting that mistake lead to some better alignment.
Pass 2 encoding (re)started right now... let's wait (again!)
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 195
Threads: 2
Joined: 2017 Dec
Thanks: 12
Given 250 thank(s) in 89 post(s)
Country:
It's sad that you don't use plugin properly.
As I said before the easiest and only one way to merge two clips together completely correct is to use statFile and run analysis pass. Then check every scene in overlay editor with difference mode and edit overlay params if necessary.
Any temporary encoding passes is bad idea.
|