Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Introduction
Forum: Presentation
Last Post: PixelPlate
3 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 13
|
Kill Bill The Whole Blood...
Forum: Released
Last Post: PixelPlate
3 hours ago
» Replies: 8
» Views: 3,875
|
Hi
Forum: Presentation
Last Post: athomasm1
10 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 21
|
Kill Bill Vol. 1 & 2 UNCU...
Forum: In progress
Last Post: SHN_TRU_92
Yesterday, 09:31 PM
» Replies: 15
» Views: 7,195
|
No Time To Die (IMAX/Open...
Forum: Released
Last Post: Hitcher
Yesterday, 05:51 PM
» Replies: 18
» Views: 831
|
Highlander II - European ...
Forum: Released
Last Post: el_hache
Yesterday, 09:07 AM
» Replies: 96
» Views: 51,094
|
Hello there!
Forum: Presentation
Last Post: el_hache
Yesterday, 02:05 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 27
|
Ransom Extended Version
Forum: Released
Last Post: DreckSoft
2024-11-22, 08:07 PM
» Replies: 16
» Views: 4,040
|
Crimson Tide Extended Cut...
Forum: Movies, TV shows and other
Last Post: AdmiralNoodles
2024-11-22, 08:06 PM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 3,621
|
Crocodile Dundee - Austra...
Forum: In progress
Last Post: DreckSoft
2024-11-22, 08:00 PM
» Replies: 20
» Views: 7,592
|
|
|
Ripping Seamless Branching Discs |
Posted by: stwd4nder2 - 2021-12-06, 03:36 AM - Forum: Capture and rip
- Replies (6)
|
|
Brought this up in another thread, but figured it deserved it's own.
Is there a "best" way to rip discs that use seamless branching? There's a couple syncs I'd like to do with discs that use it, but I don't want to sync it to my rip only to have it fall out of sync with another due to MakeMKV dropping frames.
And on a side note, why is this so difficult? Appending video files seems like a relatively simple thing to do, you'd think this would be solved by now.
|
|
|
[Retired] Hot Fuzz (2007) Open Matte |
Posted by: Hitcher - 2021-12-06, 01:45 AM - Forum: In progress
- Replies (4)
|
|
A skilled London police officer, after irritating superiors with his embarrassing effectiveness,
is transferred to a village where the easygoing officers object to his fervor for regulations,
as a string of grisly murders strikes the town.
Made from 2 sources - Starz 1080p WEB-DL (24fps) and a 720x576i HDTV (25fps)
----
It wasn't too hard to matte the Starz logo out by de-interlacing and changing the frame rate of the HDTV but there were a couple places where I had to use some frame duplication for missing parts probably due to advert breaks -
but I've hit a roadblock where the HDTV has ad popups that coincide twice with the Starz logo -
So I'm wondering if anyone here has another version I can use to patch this up?
Thanks.
|
|
|
Flagging 1080p25 as 1080i25 without re-encoding |
Posted by: Dr. Cooper - 2021-12-04, 11:07 PM - Forum: Converting, encoding, authoring
- Replies (3)
|
|
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to create a Blu-ray from a TV-show I recorded. There's also been an online-press-conference for that show which I'd like to include as a bonus-feature on the disc. However, the video from that download is 1080p at 25 FPS, which isn't supported in the Blu-ray specs.
These are the full video-details from MediaInfo:
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L5
Format settings : CABAC / 4 Ref Frames
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, Reference frames : 4 frames
Codec ID : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration : 59 min 25 s
Bit rate : 4 497 kb/s
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 25.000 FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.087
Stream size : 1.87 GiB (99%)
Default : Yes
Forced : No
The video-level also needs to be changed to 4.0 or 4.1 to match Blu-ray-specs, but that can be easily done using tsMuxeR. The rest should be ok, except for the progressive/interlaced-thing.
I know that there's a setting when encoding the video with x264 which is called "fake-interlaced". It's used to make a progressive encode, but adding an interlaced-flag to the video, so it is Blu-ray-compatible. Is there any way to add such a flag to this video, or is the only way to get it Blu-ray-compliant a re-encode?
I already tried changing the header-information in the MKV of the original file and MediaInfo shows that file as interlaced afterwards, but unfortunately tsMuxeR still recognizes it as progressive and muxes it as 1080p again.
Any idea how I can solve that issue without re-encoding the video or is it impossible and an encode can't be avoided?
|
|
|
Random thoughts about optical disc cases & covers |
Posted by: spoRv - 2021-12-04, 07:45 PM - Forum: Everything else...
- No Replies
|
|
So, yesterday I got about 300 DVD cases as a gift!
Not that I needed them, but the previous owner said "take them, or I'll throw them away..." and hence I can't refuse!
Nice fact is, there were quite some different kinds of them - many only or two specimen: single "amaray", double, with DVD symbol and without, full, slim, super slim, extra slim, black, transparent, semi-transparent, matte, glossy; one dark grey (can't remember to have seen one before), one red and one super jewel box; among them, around twenty different kind of hubs!
What to do with them? Well, as it's always better to store burned disc in single (double) cases instead inside of plastic bags, I think I'll use them to store some projects burned onto DVD and Blu-ray.
Why on Blu-ray? Isn't "better" to put them on proper Blu-ray cases? You know, I thought the same until today - when I spent quite some time dividing them... why must BD be stored in BD cases? Sure, pressed ones come with that kind of cases, but why can't I do something different? At the end, DVD cover is 26% bigger than BD one - so, it's more "important" in a way; and for sure a project burned on a BD and stored inside a DVD case would appear, if not better, at least different!
List of DVD cases from the most favourite:
- colored - I'm a sucker for them, maybe because they are quite scarce!
- violet - are there any?
- yellow - also, any out there?
- green
- red
- white
- black glossy - so elegant
- semi-transparent matte - sadly all of them with DVD logo... good for DVD projects, though!
I don't like a lot the classic black matte ones - they are so anonymous; what I can't stand are the slim/superslim/extraslim; they feel so cheap!
The only rule I gave myself, is to use NOT a DVD cover with a DVD logo for BD disc!
Thoughts?
|
|
|
A new release... "format"? |
Posted by: spoRv - 2021-12-04, 02:45 AM - Forum: General technical discussions
- Replies (7)
|
|
Tl;dr: just jump to "From Idea to Concept"!
First of all, some previous threads that lead me to this idea:
Several years have passed since I wrote them, but there is still that "bug" in my brain...
We, movie collectors, still like to have movies to... collect! One thing is to have a title in a physical format, on an optical disc, with a printed cover and possibly a booklet; something to watch, to touch, to smell... instead of a bunch of files put on a soulless hard disk or memory...
It was rewarding when a member actually printed covers and discs of some ofmy projects and shared them here - I was so proud!
Still, times change; now the majors are almost becoming minors, with two companies that previously rented DVDs and sold books now producing first class series and movies with first class actors and directors; physical discs are sadly in decline... should we surrender to that, and release all our projects as a mere single file, without printed covers and discs?
YES! BUT NO! BUT YES! BUT NO...
(saying that with Vicky Pollard's voice helps a lot!)
YES! We should release a project on a single file - without menus, playlists, directories and subdirectories etc.: most of the users (including collectors) play their files "as is"; what's the point of spending days or weeks preparing a wonderful menu, carefully authoring a complete BD structure, when most of the watchers just grab the 00001.m2ts file and mux it on mkv or mp4 and discard the rest?!?
NO! Even releasing a single file, what prevents us to make great artworks for cover and disc? Again, most of the users can't care less, but for the few remaining pure collectors among us those artworks could be a treasure!
From Idea to Concept
So, the idea is simple: release a single audio/video(/subtitle) file that could be eventually recorded on a physical optical disc, along with artwork for cover and disc (and eventual booklet), and possibly be played directly by a BD/UHD-BD player - crazy? I don't think so!
FAQ
- Which physical optical disc?
I guess there is not a lot of options here: Bu-ray and DVD; CD can't be taken in account anymore - divx times are over, luckily!
I'd say: DVD for SD or short HD content; BD-25 or BD-50 for HD or short UHD content; BD-50 or BD-100 for UHD or long HD content.
MKV or MP4; these are the ones that are most popular; also, they should be played by most BD and UHD-BD players, apart all hardware and software media players. I lean towards MKV because it's free and seems to have less playing problems.
AVC for sure; I'd add also HEVC, as it's now mature enough; I was thinking also about AV1 but not so many players are compatible; for VVC it's too early, but it will be used later, we'll see when.
FLAC for sure, as well as PCM; then DTS-HD MA, Dolby TrueHD along with DTS and Dolby Digital; thinking about AAC too.
SRT for sure; then the ones compatible with MKV and MP4 found on DVD/BD/UHD-BD.
- What kind of "format" this would be?
Something a bit like DTS Audio CD (that uses Compact Disc as disc format) or SACD (that uses DVD as disc format) or AVCHD (that can use DVD, BD, or other physical formats); Blu-ray and Ultra HD Blu-ray are file formats that use Blu-ray disc as disc format - but for example you can burn BD (or even UHD-BD) structure on a DVD-9 or even DVD-5 (albeit the former is no more BD compliant since 2011, and the latter never was) and some BD/UHD-BD players can play them.
- Why a new "format"? Aren't DVD/BD/UHD-BD enough?
Yes, they are; still there are some reasons to not use them:- they do not allow 44.1kHz - absolute must for LD and Cinema DTS untouched audio tracks
- they do not allow 2K/4K - needed for DCI contents, even if they are (still?) quite rare
- not all players can play burned discs - especially BD and UHD-BD
- format structures and file format take space - at least around 7% for BD compared to MKV
So, if you want to preserve an untouched 44.1kHz audio track and/or get DCI 2K/4K video and/or burn a file that may be compatible with an hardware player, but will be surely compatible with ALL computers with proper player and/or want to put more data onto an optical disc, then you can't use DVD/BD/UHD-BD
- Then why not using an existing file format, like AVCHD or XAVC S or XAVC HS?
Because they have some limitations - mainly no 44.1kHz and DCI 4K; albeit XAVC (non S/HS) allows 4K, it does not allow HEVC, while XAVC HD allows HEVC but not 4K!
- So at the end it will be just an MKV or MP4 container eventually burned on optical disc?
Basically yes; but there will be some rules to follow; mainly size (to fit on disc), types of container/video codec/audio codec/video resolution/audio sample frequency/video encoding settings/audio encoding settings (to be compatible with the most BD/UHD-BD players); still, less constrained than DVD/BD/UHD-BD file formats!
- What's the main point of all of this?
To set a standard that project makers can follow to produce a file that is not only compatible with all software players, but also with the vast majority of hardware media players, and that when burned on disc, with the most possible BD and UHD-BD players; even if the file burned on disc would not be compatible with some players, it could always be retained as the original copy - BD-R could last several hundred years, if not thousand - at the contrary of any HDD that may last a decade or two, or SSD/USB and other memories that last only few years, as some of you could have experienced directly... the fact that optical disc could not be read anymore in hundred years is off topic here.
- Does this phantomatic format already have a name?
Of course - and it's memorable (IMHO!)... and not only that, but already a registered domain name, too! But for the moment, let's call it "fanres disc", OK?
|
|
|
Waterworld Cinema DTS Sync |
Posted by: stwd4nder2 - 2021-12-03, 05:19 PM - Forum: Released
- Replies (9)
|
|
Thanks to BDgeek for providing the files.
This is for the theatrical cut, though I might come back to this one day and patch in the audio for the extended cut. Final encode is a BD compatible DTS-HD file, muxing to MKV requires an offset of -21ms.
Tech Info:
The raw AUD files were converted using the APT-X100 foobar2000 plugin, resampled to 48KHz, and slowed down to 23.976 FPS. Surround's have been lowered -3Db and LFE increased +3Db. Synced to US UHD.
|
|
|
|