Just finished another project...

This release was only possible with 35mm scan of the trailer to use the title animations and two scenes not found in the final cut of the movie, as well an extension of one scene. Other then that it's pretty much a one for one recreation of the trailer. As usual the trailer credit cards and green band banner have been recreated from scratch and matched.

Special thanks to Denis-Carl Robidoux for providing the 35mm scan

Dolby 5.1 audio was taken from the trailer found on the DVD

Enjoy


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Z3RwIV7TE4

Hi guys. I decided to try a project of my own after watching you work on the amazing things here. For a long time, I have the idea to collect all deleted scenes for a particular movie + use the comics that are happening during the plot of the movie, to animate them (crude but effective for me), and create an uber extended version that probably only I can appreciate...

'Started with the Star Wars Episode I, a guilty pleasure of mine.

Anyway, it's going to end up being a 5h+ long video, so I'm doing it in chunks, and then I will merge it all at the end.

It goes as expected atm, and I have done AI upscaling, editing, colour correcting and all that jazz, and exported 1st section as TIFF RGB 16bit colour sequence. Time to render it to H265 with Nvenc.

I can do yuv420 SDR 10bit 4K without any issue, cranking the bitrate around 100mbps and it's fine. It's a standard so I know I don't have to use more.

The thing is, that I am noticing a slight difference in colour and yuv444 video looks better to me (placebo or not), and my ocd is not giving me peace.

I'm trying for days now to figure out what is the bitrate that that I can use to encode this with, to avoid insane bandwith that required for playback of such file. Got down to around 70mbps video but still in some more busy places in the video a stuttering occurs that even playback from the M.2 SSD is not helping with.

So I am turning to you for advice (other than the most obvious one, "just stop insisting on 444 you crazy bastard"...). Indulge me if you can.

Did anybody try this? What is the bitrate you would go, or be OK with? How low do you think it would be OK to go for 4K SDR 10bit? I do want to kinda future-proof this project, since I'm spending so much time on it.

Hello everyone. A long time lurker here, I don't have really that much time to do amazing things you guys are doing, but I'm fascinated with the discussions here, and am just soaking up your passion. Thank you for that.

The video on the SF BD is really bad. It's heavily DNR'ed. But it has a 2.0 mix and no 5.1 mix. So, can this mean it's a genuine 2.0 mix based on the Dolby Stereo master? I'd like to remux the audio with my German BD, which isn't DNR'ed.

I'm probably not going to make anything out of this, but a new web-dl has appeared of something never physically released.  My old version, while still 1080p is inferior in video detail... except the old Dolby 5.1 audio track is 384kbps, while the new one is EAC-3 5.1 at 256kbps.
I'm not great at understanding spectrum analysis, but to my eye, the old version should be superior.  How certain can I be of that?
I'm open to opinions.

OLD:

NEW:

In the past I've been a Kodi user with either a NVidia Shield or PC/HTPC but I've grown tired of several aspects of that setup (plus my older Shield won't do DV) and was doing research into other methods of watching my discs/files.

Not in particular a fan of Plex either.

So with that in mind, I was wondering what people's opinions are some of the media players that are around. Particularly, was looking at Zidoo, Zappiti and Dune. Basically, the players with the new Realtek chipset for DV and HDR10+ and which can do the HDR to SDR conversion well for my legacy 1080p projector and CRT. I'm also trying to balance out getting the best by keep the cost down as I don't have a lot of spare change at the moment.

In researching, I'm kind of leaning towards the Zidoo Z series since it seems to have that chipset and the features I want, plus seems to be the cheapest (but not cheap). I have a somewhat negative opinion on Dune since I had one years ago in the 1080p period and found the features (or features taken away) and interface lacking. That might be unfair as they probably has changed their ways in the intervening years. Zappiti has a good rep but is more expensive then Zidoo and Dune for much of the same features. I point out that I do like their app for editing metadata content. As a person with a lot of (obviously) custom projects, editing them to appear properly in a UI is a big deal and I don't think Zidoo has the same app. Otherwise it looks like the Zap and Zidoo interface is similar, not sure about Dune.

Anyway am I off on things and does anyone have opinions or insight as to what they feel is the best?

Hi folks, a new project released for you all - a version of the Star Trek: The Next Generation pilot with lots of little fixes to CBS Digital's HD restoration from 2012 (lord, how time flies). To summarise:

1. Resynced video to the 2.0 Dolby surround track from the original DVD release. The 2.0 track on the remaster was compressed and with a duller EQ (far less high end than the DVD). Even more disastrously, on the Season 1 Blu-ray re-issue, it's a mono downmix!
Corrected the sync of the original 2.0 Stereo track, which was 1-2 frames off in various places on the Next Level Blu-ray teaser disc.
2. Shot-by-shot colour correction. Mostly minor, to improve consistency in the mid-tones (some shots were too green/yellow), restore the exposure levels of the original broadcast in some scenes and bring back a tiny amount of detail in the blacks and highlights (loads of clipping/crushing in CBS's grade). Some significant changes include:

• Restored the vignette around Q's close-ups in the court scene (the remaster was simply underexposed here, which neutralised the effect)
  
• Removed the bizarre pink and green gradients that were added to the Farpoint matte paintings in the remaster.
  
• Improved the consistency of the grading on Q's flashback scenes that Riker watches on the monitor (some shots looked almost raw in the remaster).
  
• Probably the biggest fix: the holodeck grading has been drastically improved. CBS inexplicably gave this scene a dark, icy blue grade, when it's clearly meant to be a bright, warm sunny day, as it appeared in the original broadcast.
  
• Zorn's office and many of the Bandi model shots have been darkened as they appeared in the original broadcast.
  
• Toned down the blown-out highlights on the jellyfish aliens.
  

Moved over from this thread.

I own the 1991 Orion Home Video VHS of the so-bad-it's-good 1986 NBC Christmas made-for-TV movie Babes in Toyland.

I found out last year that a DVD+R DL ISO file of the original 1986 US TV version exists, according to sporv's Workprints Master List:

Quote:Babes In Toyland [TV Version]
This version runs around 47 minutes longer than the DVD version. It contains many extra scenes, shots and lines of dialogue throughout.
NTSC DVD+R DL, Fullscreen, Quality A, 2:22:51 — Menu, TV Version Notes and a selectable TV Version Guide

Curious as it would be awesome to recreate the IMAX version.

Hi All

So my 10tb Hard Drive went down!
Lost some stuff as I hadn't done a recent back up!

It was a Seagate Iron Wolf NAS drive.

Any recommendations for large capacity Internal Hard Drives?