Posts: 43
Threads: 3
Joined: 2018 Mar
Thanks: 35
Given 27 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
Country:
As this is a good spot to discuss the variations and pros and cons of each JURASSIC PARK track, a while back someone over as AVS had done dynamic range readings of the various mixes, posted a number of graphs, and found the 7.1 3-D bluray mix to have the widest dynamic range. Wish I could find the post but so far no luck.
There of course are a number of ways to judge a mix. Is it the original mix, how low and high does it go compared to the others mixes? Likewise for any noise reduction. Dynamic range, EQ, mixing practices also play a factor. All make for a fascinating discussion.
Posts: 762
Threads: 54
Joined: 2021 Jul
Thanks: 627
Given 646 thank(s) in 302 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 43
Threads: 3
Joined: 2018 Mar
Thanks: 35
Given 27 thank(s) in 14 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 730
Threads: 114
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 278
Given 765 thank(s) in 309 post(s)
Country:
Does anyone happen to have the cinema DTS track of The Lost World JP or the LD AC-3 of the first JP?
Posts: 730
Threads: 114
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 278
Given 765 thank(s) in 309 post(s)
Country:
Thanks to a kind member here I've been able to take a look at the theatrical DTS from The Lost World.
It seems that the DTS LD has the theatrical mix but with the surrounds unattenuated by the required -3dB. The LFE isn't boosted as it is on the JP DTS LD probably because the TLW had a much louder LFE channel originally. This may go some way to explaining why the LFE on the JP DTS LD was so overcooked. Since the JP DTS LD was released after the TLW DTS LD it's possible they just wanted it to sound the same as the sequel.
The only home video mix of TLW I don't have is the DTS DVD. If this shares characteristics with the 2nd JP DTS DVD then it should be the theatrical mix with correctly attenuated surrounds. If anyone can share the audio track from this DVD then I'd be happy to confirm this.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 730
Threads: 114
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 278
Given 765 thank(s) in 309 post(s)
Country:
Yes, exactly. In fact it may even be an improvement over the cinema DTS as the LD DTS has a fully discrete LFE channel. As the theatrical DTS audio needs to have the LFE channel de-matrixed from the surrounds it results in it being overly active with audio present where it should be silent. I don't know if this is how the channel would have been theatrically or if this is just a side-effect of the software decoding method.
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Well, if we would like to get a track as closer to the theatrical experience as possible, if there were a DTS track and it's available, I'd use the Cinema DTS - eventually adjusting the surround and/or LFE level (talking in general about this).
The LD is the second best choice, if the Cinema DTS track is not available.
Posts: 730
Threads: 114
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 278
Given 765 thank(s) in 309 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
|