Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
Sorry, but the script does not produce any LUT...
And thanks, it seems that final result, even as a sort of compromise, is great indeed!
Posts: 373
Threads: 30
Joined: 2017 Mar
Thanks: 35
Given 22 thank(s) in 16 post(s)
Country:
What sort of color-matching script would produce an LUT, apart from (if I remember correctly) Dre's tool?
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
Don't know... that for sure, even if I haven't tried it (yet).
I suggest you to try to start a new thread to gather interest!
Posts: 27
Threads: 0
Joined: 2015 Jul
Thanks: 6
Given 4 thank(s) in 3 post(s)
Country:
I have very little knowledge of color grading. But your tests look good. By the way, are you not using the Sky HD version as your source, since you mentioned it has the biggest framing among the different HDTV versions?
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
I was wrong; Canal+ has the same width of Sky, but few lines more (maybe two) on bottom.
Posts: 2,517
Threads: 40
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2017
Given 432 thank(s) in 357 post(s)
Country:
(2015-05-18, 12:55 PM)spoRv Wrote: IIRC, the 2D BD has EE and/or DNR applied... am I wrong?
A WOWOW version is floating around, that *could* be eventually better to use as a source.
They are both terrible, the real timing is in the middle
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
(2017-05-23, 09:11 PM)dvdmike Wrote: They are both terrible, the real timing is in the middle
So, referring to images in post 119 ( https://fanrestore.com/thread-283-post-2...l#pid29627) which is the best version to you?
A1 A2
B1 B2
C1 C2
?
Posts: 2,517
Threads: 40
Joined: 2015 Apr
Thanks: 2017
Given 432 thank(s) in 357 post(s)
Country:
I tried colour timing talk and it went poorly this week, I am back to not doing it sorry
It's between the two, the 3d is miles oversaturated
Posts: 27
Threads: 0
Joined: 2015 Jul
Thanks: 6
Given 4 thank(s) in 3 post(s)
Country:
2017-06-05, 07:01 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-06-05, 07:09 AM by Papai2013.)
I was trying to edit JP on Adobe premiere pro CC 2017 and it was a nightmare. Frames jumping, video sped up, audio, video inconsistencies everywhere. You edit one way, result comes different. I kinda gave up. The files were .VOB from DVD and there was no problem in the source. Somehow Premiere is unable to handle .vob. I edited a short documentary recently and there was no such problem. It was MOV and super smooth. The resolution should not be a problem as the VOB files are all 576p PAL.
Any ideas here on how can I try and fix this? I don't know any other editing software.
As for JP, it should always be warm, with the faces looking sun-kissed and the greenery looking deep and healthy. That was the nature of Kodak and Fuji film stocks back then. They wanted to make pale skinned actors look exotic. It has always been a tradition since the arrival of colour film stock. There are even articles for that on the net.
However, the 3D BD is too warm and wrong but still much closer to the prints than the horrible cold timing of the HDTV or 2D BD with pinkish and magenta hues. The greenery looks lifeless in those versions and the faces, disgusting. There's barely any cinematic contrast in the HDTV master either.
Posts: 7,153
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1466 thank(s) in 963 post(s)
Country:
You must not work with VOB files directly; you should extract the MPEG video track and work with this.
I use DGindex to index the files - the result is a d2v file, basically a text file that "tells" a video editing software how to handle the video; it works on Avisynth, can't say the same for other softwares. I'd start a thread in the technical forum looking for help.
|