Hello guest, if you like this forum, why don't you register? https://fanrestore.com/member.php?action=register (December 14, 2021) x


Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 5,218
» Latest member: Ponchovil
» Forum threads: 5,800
» Forum posts: 84,864

Full Statistics

Latest Threads
The Dollars Trilogy 4K UH...
Forum: Official and unofficial releases
Last Post: marin888
Today, 12:26 AM
» Replies: 15
» Views: 2,509
Hello
Forum: Presentation
Last Post: JCStuntMan
Today, 12:25 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 19
Rumble in The Bronx (紅番區)...
Forum: Released
Last Post: Dame310
Yesterday, 10:47 PM
» Replies: 45
» Views: 22,796
Hello
Forum: Presentation
Last Post: XanderLeoarro
Yesterday, 09:32 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 23
Silence of the Lambs gets...
Forum: Official and unofficial releases
Last Post: Beber
Yesterday, 08:20 PM
» Replies: 91
» Views: 76,352
"The Insider" (1999), Mic...
Forum: Official and unofficial releases
Last Post: Beber
Yesterday, 05:57 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 405
Film logo preservation an...
Forum: Requests, proposals, help
Last Post: Bianjumu
Yesterday, 07:18 AM
» Replies: 125
» Views: 106,926
"Reservoir Dogs" open mat...
Forum: Released
Last Post: Bianjumu
Yesterday, 05:34 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 454
Jurassic Park 35mm 6.5K s...
Forum: In progress
Last Post: Aslan
2025-06-30, 11:42 PM
» Replies: 164
» Views: 52,698
Indiana Jones And The Cry...
Forum: Requests, proposals, help
Last Post: uVSthem
2025-06-30, 07:27 PM
» Replies: 11
» Views: 2,081

 
  VHS Formatted to fit your TV ? Fullscreen or Widescreen
Posted by: Glastontown - 2018-05-09, 07:04 PM - Forum: Movies, TV shows and other - Replies (13)

I'm collecting VHS, primarily Fullscreen, I occassionally come across titles that, rather than stating that they are Fullscreen or Widescreen, say they are "modified to fit your TV" Anyone have any experience with this, what does it mean? Currently looking at Requiem For a Dream, edited version, description - Canadian Home Video. " The film has been modified from it's original version. it has been formatted to fit your TV." I have  brilliant Toshiba TV from 1999, which I still use for VHS.
Regards  Glastontown.

Print this item

  UHD Releases but still the extras are in SD?
Posted by: Ronster - 2018-05-09, 04:30 PM - Forum: Everything else... - No Replies

I have not yet or I am yet to migrate to UHD... I have a UHD TV with HDR and I will eventually start buying in to this format I suppose.

But when it comes to getting a UHD release ok, I own every film I practically I want to own in SD or HD, If I want it in UHD It will have to be something I really care to own in UHD because of the price tag. And the player costs...

But all these releases still have all the bonus content in Standard definition... How stupidly lazy still keep  adding the same old Bonus SD content without re-scanning the bonus material and upgrading that also.

So it's as if there is no budget for HD Deleted scenes or documentaries only the films themselves and that really is a bummer.

It does not really make me want to re-buy any films that I really admire at all... I don't feel any draw towards UHD when I look at the extras and they are all in SD... And also nothing new is being offered.

Considering I also churn these days at about 4 or 5 new films a year I really like...

DVD was amazing when it first hit and it still carries on surviving and Blu-ray has not killed it off and also UHD won't kill it off...

So what will kill off DVD and the Special features from the classics you love... Because only the films get a job and most of the time people complain about it looking different and also everything in the bonus section is just ported straight over in SD anyway.

What reason to keep buying the same if nothing new is offered?

Print this item

  Audio and frame rates?
Posted by: Serums - 2018-05-07, 10:28 AM - Forum: Audio and video editing - Replies (2)

Hello.

I've got a HD WEB-DL of a film that I'd like to sync the original audio to, as the WEB-DL doesn't feature the original track. I've got two sources of the original audio. One from a laserdisc (taken from a video/audio capture rather than a dedicated audio capture), and an official DVD. The DVD is cut, as is the WEB-DL. I'd love to restore the missing scene, but as yet it's beyond my capabilities.

The problem I'm having is that the respective sources seem to be running at different frame rates. The WEB-DL runs at 24 fps, and the DVD and LD capture both run at 29.97 fps. Looking at the audio, the DVD runs about 2 minutes longer than the WEB-DL. The DVD suffers from frame cuts, as I'm guessing would the WEB-DL (additional to the cut scene). If I was to try to sync the audio from the DVD to the WEB-DL, what could I do to convert the audio to match the frame rate?

Regards.

Print this item

  Bad Taste (1987) Audio from JAP LD
Posted by: bendermac - 2018-05-04, 08:58 PM - Forum: Requests, proposals, help - No Replies

I know this is a long shot, but maybe someone does have it

The Japanese LaserDisc has the english audio in it's original mono,
while the movie itself is uncut. If someone has it and can capture
the audio, with the video to help syncing, would be wonderful.

Since the audio on the LD is analoge only, I'd suggest to get the highest
capture quality possible, like 24bit at 96kHz. We can downsample from
that later on.

Thanks in advance

Print this item

  Correct Bad Frame Rate Conversion
Posted by: CSchmidlapp - 2018-05-03, 10:05 AM - Forum: Converting, encoding, authoring - Replies (29)

Hello again Fanres.

So I have some Video Footage that is PAL 25fps that has been converted from NTSC 29.976.
There are the usual signs like blending between shots.
This is video footage shot in the early 90's and not from a film source.

Does anybody know of any techniques to return it back to its original form?
Preferably by an AVIsynth plugin / script.

I understand it maybe impossible but there are wizards around these parts Wink
Thanks again for your time folks.

Print this item

  x264 encoding from Adobe Premiere
Posted by: DoomBot - 2018-04-30, 06:28 PM - Forum: Converting, encoding, authoring - Replies (26)

It's no shock that the encoders built in Adobe Premiere are just trash. So any encoding would be done outside AP by encoding an AVI then using script. For the longest time i've been wanting to find another way to encode from Adobe Premiere and skip the AVI altogether. I think i found a workaround thanks to a guy that goes by the name Vouk. He came up with a free plugin based on LIBAV. I did some small testing alongside script encoding and got some nice results. Still have to do an entire film to make sure there's no issues.

https://www.voukoder.org/forum/board/3-voukoder/

https://www.voukoder.org/forum/board/12-bug-reports/

https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/3853...r-premiere

https://github.com/Vouk/voukoder/releases/


Just need to figure out all the settings in the advanced settings to make sure it's as good as we can get it.

[Image: image.jpg] [Image: image.jpg]
[Image: image.jpg] [Image: image.jpg]
[Image: image.jpg] [Image: image.jpg]
[Image: image.jpg] [Image: image.jpg]
[Image: image.jpg]

Print this item

  video processors reviews
Posted by: spoRv - 2018-04-28, 01:11 PM - Forum: General technical discussions - Replies (1)

A page with interesting reviews about video processors, scalers, deinterlacers etc.

http://retrogaming.hazard-city.de

aimed mainly to retrogamers, but contains info that could apply also to SD video sources as laserdisc, VHS, CED, VHD etc.


If anyone has links to pages like these, feel free to post them; I'll add them here.

Print this item

  An American Werewolf in London open matte?
Posted by: drsyn71 - 2018-04-27, 04:27 AM - Forum: Movies, TV shows and other - Replies (3)

I know Landis shot a lot of his stuff open matte. Is AAWIL one of them? I saw some talk here about the audio mixes of it, but I didn't see if anyone had confirmed it it has been shot open matte as well and what source (TV, Laserdisc, DVD, etc.)

Print this item

  Time for a new display? Opinions wanted!
Posted by: spoRv - 2018-04-25, 11:29 PM - Forum: Everything else... - Replies (17)

Some of you may know that I acquired an used 55' FALD (full array local dimming) LED Toshiba display about one year ago. Sadly, lately it decided to follow the path of its Samsung predecessor (which Toshiba is almost a simple rebadged version, excluding few electronics improvements)... black thin lines (about one pixel high, evenly spaced every twenty pixels or so) appeared on the right side, slowly dim towards left up to half screen... still working, but once seen, it cannot be unseen! Sad

not my TV, but to give you an idea:
[Image: fR0zV35.jpg]
only mine are less spaced, less obstrusive and dim until they disappear... still, quite noticeable during light
scenes, and a punch in the eye when using it as monitor, with white backgrounds - almost 90% of web pages!

There is maybe a chance this problem would go away once ribbon cables are removed, cleaned, and firmly reinserted - maybe a rusty connector causes it... I'll try to do it ASAP, as I need someone who should help me to do that.

In the (not so remote) case the defect will remain, I think I'll be forced to buy another one. Can't afford a new model with features I'd love to, so I started to look around for used ones; hoping this time to be a little more lucky. Haven't any money to buy it, so I must ask some bucks to dad... "Daddy, daddy, I need a new TV... another? Yes, the old one is broken... can't you see those black lines... no? Well, you can have it!" Big Grin


[Image: 11292010_leslie1.jpg]
"what black lines?!?"

It's not an easy choice... which technology? Resolution? Size? I made A LOT of research, in particular regarding new models - where older ones I was still aware since long researches made last year, and I found three completely different candidates... let's see them:


Pioneer PDP-LX5090 - 500€ - a Kuro plasma, the king of TVs few years ago, and still a great display!
[Image: rh_50xga_s33_main.jpg]
Pro: wonderful image, deep blacks, a lot of settings, the only one that plays 24fps material at 72Hz AFAIK, one of the best plasma ever made, perfect status (owned by one of my friends, so it's almost "guaranteed") and relatively few hours of usage (two/three hours a day, considering it's a 2011 set, is good), 2km from me, good price including original box, manuals, remotes, horizontal speakers, two table stands (one fixed, another swivel), 100+€ power cable (if/when I'll decide to sell it, those are great plus)
Cons: usual plasma limits, in particular burn in (I'm using it as a monitor several hours a day), high electric consumption, "only" 50', "only" HD, no 3D, seven years old
Review: http://web.archive.org/web/2008090104260...DP-LX5090/


Sony KDL-55HX920 - 500€ (availability to be confirmed) FALD LED

[Image: sonyhx920-4l.jpg]


Pro: same technology I used for 6+ years (and I like it), but with newer features, good quality (maybe a tad lower than Pioneer), great blacks (to be a LED), no burn-in, 3D with at least 2 pair of glasses included, apps, good price, newer model than Pioneer, perfect size
Cons: usual FALD limits, limited FALD zones (probably 96), "only" HD, 600km away (back and forth), six years old, still have to receive an answer from the owner to know if it's available
Review: http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/sony-kdl-...021318.htm


Panasonic TX-58DX902 - 950€ - THX UltraHD Premium

[Image: 484507?w=660&h=397]

Pro: probably the best LED ever made, high-end model, THX certification, UHD, HDR, 98% DCI-P3 gamut, 512 FALD zones, HDCP 2.2, 1300+ nits, good audio quality, bigger size, 2016 model but bought on 2017-02, so still 10 months warranty
Cons: usual FALD limits (but I was used to 96 FALD zones, so I *think* those would not be huge problems), price in comparison to the previous ones (even if more than good considering the features and only one year old), 600km away (back and forth)
Review: http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/tx58dx902...174282.htm


If money would not be a concern (and sadly it is), I'd go with the Panasonic for sure; Sony is very similar to mine so I'm pretty sure it will be OK for the use I make; Pioneer is great and in perfect status and I know its owner but it's a plasma and it will be burned sooner or later (probably sooner)...

I'm almost convinced to jump on the UHD train, along with HDR of course; I excluded OLED at all not only for price - a nice 55' model, used, is around 1500€ if not more, still basic LG models though (good Panasonic and Sony OLEDs used are more than 2000€) - but also because I fear burn in as well, non-homogeneous screen, low motion resolution... while Panasonic has all the FALD problems, I lived six years with them (and I passed A LOT of hours, too many, in front of them), and seen hundreds, thousands movies, TV series, TV shows, noticing those problems (actually, just blooming) only in very limited occasions.

At the end, I think I'll do this: Pioneer can wait, as my friend will likely let it go not before end of May; both Sony and Panasonic owners live in the same city, so if Sony's one would answer, I'll pay a visit to both in the same day, and eventually pick one of them - if not, Pioneer will wait for me!

(or, I can resurrect my old Sony 28' 16/9 CRT at a whopping 576i with just SCART, S-Video and composite inputs!)

Print this item

  how to extract DTS-ES 6.1
Posted by: spoRv - 2018-04-25, 08:18 AM - Forum: Audio and video editing - Replies (34)

Yesterday I discovered I have a DVD with the Italian track in DTS-ES 6.1 96/24, while the BD has "only" the PCM 5.1 (presumably 48/16); so, I thought to try to extract it and eventually use it to mux with BD.

But I was not able to extract all the channels; all I get was the 5.1 downmix... I tried both FooBar2000 and Eac3to; with the first, if I use the dtshd plugin (which clearly states that it does not work with 96/24), I got reduced length, and distorted sound, but all the channels are there (actually, 8 instead 7, but I guess one is just a copy of another), while with the "simple" dts decoder, it works well but only 5.1.

Eac3to conversion was more convoluted; I tried using LAVfilters, and again 5.1 96/24 - but the newer version doesn't work... tried to add ArcSoft dts decoder (the only one I've found is 1.1.0.7); while Eac3to -test shows that is works, it isn't - it tried to convert the file (also only 5.1) but fails; *maybe* 1.1.0.8 could solve the problem, but I wasn't able to find it out.

Mediainfo of the dts-es file (which is the last vob file, for test purposes):

Code:
General
Complete name                            : E:\VTS_01_7 T8a DELAY -165ms.dts
Format                                   : DTS
Format/Info                              : Digital Theater Systems
Format profile                           : 96/24 / ES Matrix / Core
File size                                : 99.7 MiB
Duration                                 : 9 min 14 s
Overall bit rate mode                    : Constant
Overall bit rate                         : 1 510 kb/s

Audio
Format                                   : DTS
Format/Info                              : Digital Theater Systems
Format profile                           : 96/24 / ES Matrix / Core
Mode                                     : 16
Format settings, Endianness              : Big
Duration                                 : 9 min 14 s
Bit rate mode                            : Constant
Bit rate                                 : 1 510 kb/s
Channel(s)                               : 7 channels / 7 channels / 6 channels
Channel positions                        : Front: L C R, Side: L R, Back: C, LFE / Front: L C R, Side: L R, Back: C, LFE / Front: L C R, Side: L R, LFE
Sampling rate                            : 96.0 kHz / 48.0 kHz / 48.0 kHz
Frame rate                               : 93.750 FPS (512 spf)
Bit depth                                : 24 bits
Compression mode                         : Lossy
Stream size                              : 99.7 MiB (100%)


tried to demux it with eac3to, tsmuxer and dgindex, same results.

HELP! Big Grin

Print this item