I don't know if you still consider of regrade Mad Max and if you already know what I will say PDB, but in case.
In the scene where Jesse discovers the hand of Condolini, we can notice that an hand (Andrew Jones's hand) holds the chain. On the BD the image has been cropped to make it disappear:

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/130251

Lotto your link doesn't work.

I created two more threads in the proposal section to split MM and MM3 into their own threads. Seem that there is enough info and discussion to warrant it:

Mad Max
https://fanrestore.com/showthread.php?tid=374

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome
https://fanrestore.com/showthread.php?tid=373

(2015-06-07, 03:47 AM)PDB Wrote: Lotto your link doesn't work.

Weird. Nobody can open the link ?
I post the pictures in the Mad Max regrade treath.

Link works

Works for me now, sorry

(2015-03-16, 08:05 PM)PDB Wrote: As good as his word, Jonno was nice enough to give me a copy of the Road Warrior LD and there is a color difference. It seems that the LD is the same master from what I can see (cuts, damage, dirt, etc) but the DVD has a pink/magenta/red tint to it versus the LD which has a more yellow tint. I kind of expected the tint on the DVD since it seems that some of the 1st gen DVDs from Warners used LD masters and added a pink/magenta/red tint (see Blade Runner)
DVD/LD (not same frame)
[Image: rw_dvdld.jpg]
You can see the difference but overall the LD is pretty close to the DVD especially when compared to the BD
DVD/LD/BD
[Image: rw_dvd_ld_bd.jpg]
[Image: rw_dvd_ld_bd_2.jpg]
I'm leaning towards the LD as a better source for colors.

Thanks for doing this. This is what I have wondered about for some time. I only have the DVD and BD but those images concur with my experiences-especially with WB.
The big differences are in the formats and how they were mastered. PDB was right to bring up BLADE RUNNER as the DC CAV LD is wonderful compared to the poor 1997 DVD. I do think the LD shown here suffers from the typical slight contrast push they typically did back in the day (worst of all on the Batman series) but reveals the flipside of what the DVD does. To be really sure I'll have to get the LD myself and run through comb filter onto the CRT then toggle with the DVD.
Jonno's audio comparison is probably spot-on. The later the disc, the more serious they usually were about transfers. Being WB, they would also recycle them into DVD 100%. Being a 1994 release I would assume they went back to the Dolby Stereo master.


I still remember the cinematographer somewhere saying how he had to keep going back to the lab to push the film further to achieve the wasteland look. Apparently they shot it and the first result was practically what we see on the BD.

A few of those reasons are why I'm trying to grade based on a mix of the two. Each has their pluses and minuses. Having gone through both completely I lean more towards the DVD, since the LD has a few shots that are inexplicably blown out (sky is white on the LD, blue on the DVD). I can only assume the LD master went through some more work before it came out as the DVD master.

I got a kick out of this one

https://vimeo.com/132968940

(2015-07-18, 01:58 AM)DoomBot Wrote: I got a kick out of this one

https://vimeo.com/132968940

That's awesome!

Indeed, that was freaking awesome.

Thanx for sharing that DoomBot, I needed the laugh