Posts: 7,151
Threads: 601
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 1081
Given 1497 thank(s) in 969 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 701
Threads: 28
Joined: 2016 Feb
Thanks: 189
Given 254 thank(s) in 182 post(s)
Country:
Be careful with 35mm sources as there were a load struck in 2001 for an anniversary release (seen it on the big screen twice now)
Posts: 1,186
Threads: 54
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 96
Given 98 thank(s) in 80 post(s)
Country:
2017-07-16, 05:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-07-16, 05:31 AM by Jetrell Fo.)
Posts: 750
Threads: 6
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 7
Given 66 thank(s) in 45 post(s)
2017-07-18, 05:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 2017-07-18, 05:34 PM by TServo2049.)
Actually, I'm not sure whether reprints from 2001 would look that different. I have seen prints of 80s films that must have come from the 2000s, since they showed minimal wear, yet they looked authentically of their era to my eyes (admittedly never having seen original prints of any of them, except for a faded original 70mm of Star Trek II). I feel like they wouldn't have done much work beyond striking a fresh print off an existing intermediate that was fully timed for theatrical. (This is all just guessing, of course.)
If they didn't have the fixes from the DVD version, I'd be surprised if they had any timing differences either. bigrob, did the prints you saw look different from our current evidence of the original timing (1st German DVD, 1st UK VHS, 35mm film cells)?
Posts: 5,153
Threads: 182
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 3569
Given 3251 thank(s) in 1367 post(s)
Country:
I got to say Zoidberg's VHS looks about the closest I've seen in video (well from seeing those pictures) to what I think T1 should look like, based on all the evidence I have collected. The movie should have a lot of green unlike the old BD/DVD but not to the level of the remastered BD or German DVD. Both of those are missing a lot of the blue the movie should still have.
Posts: 701
Threads: 28
Joined: 2016 Feb
Thanks: 189
Given 254 thank(s) in 182 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 750
Threads: 6
Joined: 2015 Jan
Thanks: 7
Given 66 thank(s) in 45 post(s)
2017-07-19, 01:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 2017-07-19, 01:58 PM by TServo2049.)
Ok, then I stand corrected. So those 2001 prints clearly were based on the 2001 remaster and are to be regarded with suspicion as to the color.
I had no idea there were prints with the remixed audio, that sucks. If a 35mm screening ever happens around here I hope we don't get one of those prints. Thankfully there are plenty of film cells of an original, mono print out there, so we have a good idea of what it looked like.
Zoidberg, did you get to see T1 in 35mm? I never heard you report back.
Posts: 701
Threads: 28
Joined: 2016 Feb
Thanks: 189
Given 254 thank(s) in 182 post(s)
Country:
Posts: 2,127
Threads: 56
Joined: 2016 Dec
Thanks: 164
Given 1058 thank(s) in 645 post(s)
Posts: 95
Threads: 5
Joined: 2017 Aug
Thanks: 0
Given 1 thank(s) in 1 post(s)
Country:
2017-08-09, 02:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 2017-08-09, 03:24 AM by Ronster.)
|