| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Evil Dead: trying to matc...
Forum: Official and unofficial releases
Last Post: MrBrown
42 minutes ago
» Replies: 2
» Views: 37
|
"The Terminator" 1984 hom...
Forum: In progress
Last Post: izzybell
1 hour ago
» Replies: 32
» Views: 3,590
|
TERMINATOR 2 Blu-ray regr...
Forum: In progress
Last Post: Beber
1 hour ago
» Replies: 97
» Views: 32,782
|
Charlie and the Chocolate...
Forum: Requests, proposals, help
Last Post: James76
3 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 21
|
Greetings to everyone
Forum: Presentation
Last Post: Desen6961
Today, 09:07 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 36
|
The Taking of Pelham One ...
Forum: Released
Last Post: wright96d
Today, 05:26 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 123
|
Terminator 2 CDS mix
Forum: Released
Last Post: borisanddoris
Yesterday, 09:51 PM
» Replies: 431
» Views: 456,100
|
Alien (1979) - 4K UHD Aud...
Forum: Released
Last Post: FoLLgoTT
Yesterday, 12:33 PM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 3,343
|
Jurassic Park 35mm 6.5K s...
Forum: In progress
Last Post: Machete86
Yesterday, 11:36 AM
» Replies: 240
» Views: 204,461
|
TROY (2004) - Replace Sco...
Forum: Requests, proposals, help
Last Post: TR95
Yesterday, 07:58 AM
» Replies: 117
» Views: 76,161
|
|
|
| LaserDisc dual mono tracks |
|
Posted by: Turisu - 2022-06-08, 09:07 PM - Forum: General technical discussions
- Replies (19)
|
 |
It's been observed by myself and others that dual mono tracks on LD always have a minor volume difference between the L and R channels. I believe the reason for this is to prevent everything being sent to the centre speaker by a Dolby Pro Logic receiver.
Dual mono tracks on modern formats don't seem to do this and have identical L and R channels. So my question is; are modern receivers able to distinguish between plain 2.0 stereo tracks and matrixed DPL 2.0 tracks in a way that LD-era amps could not?
The reason I ask is that I've previously been 'correcting' all of my LD mono tracks by deleting one channel and then duplicating the other prior to muxing. But I'm worried that by doing so I'm dooming everything to the centre speaker on a multi-channel receiver. I only have a 2-channel set up currently so I'm unable to test any of this for myself.
|
|
|
| Dumbo (1941) - BD/DVD mono |
|
Posted by: NeonBible - 2022-06-06, 07:59 PM - Forum: Requests, proposals, help
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Hello
Does anyone have the Dolby Digital 2.0 mono track from the 70th anniversary Blu-ray or DVD?
I have the older 60th anniversary DVD which contains only the 5.1 remix. I don't know what the 70th DVD looks like, but 60th hasn't been grained scrubbed like the Blu-ray.
Thanks.
|
|
|
| How to post videos that use pieces of copyrighted content |
|
Posted by: captainsolo - 2022-06-06, 03:19 AM - Forum: Everything else...
- Replies (8)
|
 |
Hi all,
I've been working on a goofy idea for a joke video but am worried about posting it on Youtube. It involves doing a redub of a film. (which I used to do in college for a laugh) I'm only doing selected short scenes and cutting around using the entire sequences. I'm also doing all the audio myself without anything from the film. The goal is to make it like an old incomplete workprint with a different temp ADR audio track.
Has anyone ever tried to do something like this? I'm just terrified of getting copyright strikes. I guess it just depends on if the owner is overzealous or not about taking things down.
|
|
|
| 5.1 to 4.0 down convert |
|
Posted by: uVSthem - 2022-05-31, 06:26 PM - Forum: Requests, proposals, help
- Replies (6)
|
 |
The Japanese UHD of King Kong vs. Godzilla from 1963 has the original 4.0 mix packed as DTS-MA 5.1. The LFE channel is empty and the two back channels are identical. What is the correct way to convert this to FLAC 4.0 or DTS-MA 4.0? Is this even something worth doing?
|
|
|
Need advice on location changes in the movie |
|
Posted by: Bilbofett - 2022-05-29, 11:04 AM - Forum: Official and unofficial releases
- No Replies
|
 |
I'm working on a fanres of a movie.
IMO, they were giving locations (ie. New York, USA), etc. whenever the characters traveled.
It seems like they were very specific for some scenes, then forgot to do it for later, and then just quit.
I am seeking to create more cohesiveness, and establish a "rule" to follow, so then I can know which locations to name when they go there.
Do you have any tips, suggestions for how I could create a general rule to follow for just how many locations I add as text on the screen?
There was a movie, Vantage Point (2008), that had a ticking timer counting down, and it just became too much, and monotonous, the audience started laughing every time the timer came on screen.
...So, I don't want to go that far.
Utilizing it too much will become annoying, acting as if the audience is very dumb, and cannot follow.. so I don't want to do that.
This movie is very international, so I was thinking "only when they change continents"... like a Bond movie would. But that might not be enough,.. there's a ton of location changes. So, I'm not sure.
Any help, guidance is appreciated!
|
|
|
|